The public news service OSN reported that the singer Alsu has begun court proceedings to prevent her former husband, Jan Abramov, from traveling outside Russia as part of their ongoing separation. The move comes amid discussions about custody and the future arrangement of their family, and it has drawn attention from fans and media alike.
According to lawyer Alexander Dobrovinsky, Alsu’s team evaluated the arguments presented by Abramov’s representatives as insufficient. He noted that attempts by Alsu’s lawyers to impose travel restrictions on Abramov were unlikely to prevail, at least based on the information available to him at the time. The details of the case remain a focal point for observers following the couple’s split.
In commentary connected to the proceedings, one participant suggested that more forceful measures at the border could carry greater weight than purely legal arguments, implying that practical impact might hinge on keeping Abramov within the country during the dispute. The remark underscored how strategic moves in family-law cases can intersect with broader travel and asset considerations.
Media outlets reported that Alsu filed another petition seeking a travel ban on her former husband and added newly acquired real estate to the claim. The properties in question were purchased by a couple during 2023 and 2024 and were registered to third parties, a detail that appears to be aimed at shaping the scope of the case and any potential assets involved in the dispute.
Alsu and Abramov married in 2006 and have three children—Safina, 17; Mikella, 16; and Raphael, 7. The singer has stated that the children are deeply concerned about their parents’ divorce and the evolving family dynamic. Earlier this year, Alsu filed for divorce, while official reasons for the separation were not formally disclosed. Rumors circulated about a renewed relationship involving the singer and a well-known model, though those rumors remained unconfirmed by official sources.
Earlier, Morgenshtern, a figure who has been designated a foreign agent in Russia, issued a public response related to the broader context of the case. The remark contributed to the ongoing public dialogue surrounding the personal lives of public figures and the legal processes tied to their separation.
In summary, the situation illustrates how celebrity divorces can intertwine with travel restrictions, asset declarations, and media scrutiny, creating a multi-layered legal narrative that continues to unfold as families navigate public interest and private realities.