In a public account on social media, a contemporary artist and tattooist describes a traumatic incident from 2021 involving a colleague named Viktor Zabuga. The account presents the claim that Zabuga violated her during an evening she spent at his apartment with friends. The narrative situates the event within a social setting that included drinking and a sequence of encounters that followed what was described as a third date, with the victim being nineteen at the time. The account emphasizes that she made decisions in the moment that led to the use of substances that are now banned, and that shortly after, she experienced a medical and emotional decline that she characterizes as fainting and losing control of her body. This account frames the episode as a grave breach of trust and personal safety, occurring in a space that was supposed to feel safe and familiar to her.
The victim recalls lying unconscious during the encounter and recounts fragments of the sequence that followed, including the perception of Zabuga returning to an unoccupied home, moving through a darkened room, and engaging in sexual activity without her able to consent or respond in a typical manner. The account stresses the power imbalance and the vulnerability she felt while in a state she describes as immobile, likening her condition to being unable to communicate or resist as the events unfolded. Additional materials shared by the claimant include messages that purportedly document a dialogue between Zabuga and the artist about the incident, as well as a photograph that allegedly shows the artist in a vulnerable position in that same apartment, extending the impression of manipulation and coercion surrounding the event.
These assertions contribute to a broader narrative about safeguarding boundaries in intimate encounters and the responsibilities of those who are in positions of power within professional or social networks. The account underscores concerns about how trust can be exploited in social circles where drinking, substances, and a misjudged sense of camaraderie may intersect with harm. The story is framed as a stark reminder of the lasting impact that assault can have on a person’s mental health, self-perception, and creative work. It also invites discussion about accountability, the seriousness of alleged acts, and how communities respond when sensitive accusations arise that involve individuals who are known in artistic and professional circles.
Finally, the account references a broader cultural context in which rumors and sensational claims can become entangled with legacy, reputation, and the public perception of individuals who cross professional lines. It stresses the importance of careful legal and ethical consideration when allegations surface, and it calls for support structures that help survivors navigate the aftermath and pursue redress through appropriate channels. The narrative does not minimize the harm described, but rather seeks to illuminate the complexities surrounding cases of sexual violence and the ways communities acknowledge and address such experiences from a position of responsibility and care for those affected.