Relatives of foreign agents should not become the main focus of public attention. Russian citizens travel abroad, return home, and then go abroad again. This cycle happens everywhere. A lawful, respectable Russian citizen typically returns to the homeland—the Russian Federation—by choice, and often leaves again by choice, too. Such movements are a normal part of life for many people who travel between countries, and this has been observed in many nations around the world.
Reportedly, Alla Pugacheva returned to Russia late last night. Sources indicated she crossed the border in the Pskov region. Information about her arrival was confirmed by a press associate. When questioned about the duration of her Moscow visit, the reply was that it was unknown, and that the purpose of any trip can vary with time and circumstances.
There were comments suggesting the artist’s visit to arrange personal affairs, including arrangements related to property and documents for moving to new residences. Others suggested she might be weighing ways to assist her husband in specific legal or administrative matters, though these claims remained speculative.
In addition, some observers speculated that there could be a public event in which the artist might participate, such as a farewell for a respected conductor who had recently passed away. These reports circulated in media discussions but lacked independent confirmation.
Activists react to Pugacheva
Her husband, Maxim Galkin, who is listed by authorities as a foreign agent in Russia, did not accompany her on the trip. Shortly after, some outlets reported that members of the activist movement People’s Call approached authorities with requests to investigate potential sponsorship of military aid to a neighboring country. The demands included addressing posts that critics described as insulting, with penalties outlined under applicable administrative codes. The discussions referenced public statements in which the artists expressed a stance different from the official position on certain political matters.
The country’s leading artist living abroad
During the autumn, the Justice Ministry added Galkin to an official list of foreign agents. He has publicly commented on the military conflict and related political debates from abroad, laying out his views to followers and media audiences. The ministry notes that his activities receive support from foreign sources, which is the basis for the designation.
Speaking to followers online, he emphasized sincerity and personal integrity as values guiding his public communications. He rejected the idea that public statements could be bought or traded for financial or political advantage, and he expressed hope that genuine conscience remains intact. He also commented on the ministry’s decision via social media, seeking to clarify his stance and reassure supporters about his motives and allegiance to his country.
In the same period, the artist urged the ministry to consider recognizing her own work in the public sphere as part of the broader national conversation. She wrote that solidarity with her husband and shared ideas of peaceful, prosperous life for the nation should not be misrepresented. The remarks were published amid ongoing debates about national unity and civic responsibility.
As of late, the couple has been based outside the country, with reports indicating residence abroad in regions where many public figures continue to engage with audiences across borders. Earlier in the year, there were occasions when the artist traveled back to Moscow for personal or ceremonial reasons, underscoring the ongoing ties with the homeland and its cultural life.