Producer Victor Kinne shared remarks in an interview, elaborating on the moment after Eurovision when Alla Pugacheva was elevated to the status of a Diva in the eyes of many fans and critics. He explained that Pugacheva has long carried a pronounced sense of self-worth and importance, a trait that has shaped how she is perceived and how she carries herself in the spotlight. According to Kinne, this enduring self-confidence explains why she reportedly embraces the Diva title with a blend of seriousness and humor, without feeling forced by others to adopt any particular label.
Kinne noted that Pugacheva has consistently demonstrated a strong belief in her own significance. He recalled that after her Eurovision appearance, during which she performed the song Diva, she was widely recognized as a standout figure in the industry. The producer observed that Pugacheva developed a rapport with audiences and colleagues alike, eventually becoming accustomed to the status she had earned and sometimes taking it for granted because it felt natural to her.
Following the start of a military operation in Ukraine, Pugacheva left Russia with her husband, Maxim Galkin, who has faced designation as a foreign agent within the Russian Federation, as well as their children. The move took the family to Israel. In responses to the departure and the broader geopolitical context, Pugacheva spoke out against critics and detractors and suggested that those who oppose her and her husband could be labeled as foreign agents, while she described some who opposed them as serfs who had become slaves in a symbolic sense. These remarks sparked debates among supporters and critics alike, highlighting how public figures often endure intense scrutiny in times of political tension.
In a separate development, a Telegram channel reported in February that tensions between Pugacheva and authorities intensified discussions within the State Duma. The report claimed that there were calls for the Ministry of Internal Affairs to examine whether it would be possible to seize the real estate owned by Pugacheva and Galkin under fraud-related provisions tied to actions affecting national security. The material suggested that measures could be pursued under a broader framework aimed at safeguarding state security. The report also mentioned that officials were considering using existing legal mechanisms to address such concerns.
Earlier, a lawyer provided clarification about why the castle associated with Pugacheva could not be seized. The expert described legal and procedural safeguards that make the seizure of property for political or reputational reasons unlikely in this case, emphasizing the importance of concrete grounds and due process when applying such measures. This legal context helped to frame ongoing discussions about potential property actions in relation to high-profile figures, illustrating how law, politics, and celebrity intersect in contemporary public life.
Overall, the discourse surrounding Alla Pugacheva during this period reflects a blend of admiration for her career and controversy over her political stances and public statements. The complexity of her public image underscores how fame can coexist with contested viewpoints, and how a single public figure can become a focal point for broader conversations about power, loyalty, and national identity. Observers note that her influence in music and pop culture remains substantial, even as she, her family, and their choices continue to generate debate across social and political lines.