A high profile blogger and businesswoman named Aiza-Liluna Ai was noted for joining a Telegram channel that teased a provocative party hosted by TV personality Nastya Ivleeva.
Sources close to the scene say the event was lively and entertaining for attendees, with reports highlighting a carefree atmosphere that matched Ivleeva’s bold public persona.
According to Isa, a participant who spoke privately, the mood was light. She emphasized a personal stance on moderation, noting that she chooses not to drink while still appreciating the chance to celebrate in a stylish setting and to admire one’s own form in a crowd that embraces fearless self-expression.
Isa also commented on the aftermath of the nude-themed party, noting that Ivleeva faced criticism and inquiries about finances from some observers. The businesswoman suggested that Ivleeva should brace for strong public scrutiny and possible online backlash as part of living in the spotlight.
Her observations extended to a broader reflection on fame, humility, and the urgency of managing public perception in today’s fast-moving information age. The speaker remarked that vanity trends resemble a relic from earlier decades, as people increasingly monetize attention and reveal every moment of their lives online. The maxim she shared, that money often travels with silence, underscored a belief that restraint can be a powerful form of self-control in a culture obsessed with visibility. Jealousy, she noted, is a common human impulse, and not everyone can navigate the pressures that come with wealth and fame.
The party itself took place at a Moscow club known for its provocative themes. Guests were encouraged to attend in semi-naked ensembles, and the guest list read like a Who’s Who of Russian pop culture. Among those present were public figures and performers who have long been part of Ivleeva’s orbit, contributing to a night marked by audacious fashion and public conversation about sexuality and media scrutiny.
On the following day, a deputy from the State Duma requested oversight from several government bodies to review the legality of the event held at Ivleeva’s venue. The request included a review for compliance with laws that govern public demonstrations and information dissemination. The aim was to address concerns raised by advocates who view certain content as potentially extremist or inappropriate for the broader public, especially given the event’s intimate dress code.
Separately, activists urged authorities to verify the authenticity of Ivleeva’s earnings connected to the party, citing items that drew attention for their extravagant price tags. Reports from a media channel noted a high-value item on display, sparking discussions about celebrity wealth, fashion, and the optics of luxury. The incident became a focal point for debates about privacy, public image, and accountability in the influencer economy.
Previously, critics had voiced disapproval of Ivleeva’s nude party, adding another layer to a broader conversation about limits, taste, and the role of media personalities in shaping cultural norms. The dialogue touched on issues of censorship, creative expression, and the boundaries of permissible public behavior in a media landscape that prizes audacious storytelling.