General Mohammad Reza Naghdi of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard warned the United States that the Mediterranean could become a new pressure point if Israel continues its actions in Gaza. This statement was relayed by Aftab News as part of a broader call for regional restraint and strategic responses.
He described a sequence where tensions in the Persian Gulf and the Strait of Hormuz intensified last year, followed by the Bab al-Mandeb Strait and the Red Sea becoming obstacles to would be aggressors. According to Naghdi, continued violence would push these corridors toward broader disruption, culminating in what he called a Mediterranean focus for potential escalations.
Naghdi projected that the United States and its allies could face the emergence of new resistance networks and additional blockades restricting critical maritime routes. He named passages such as the Strait of Gibraltar as possible focal points for future actions, signaling a wider strategic theater beyond the Middle East. The comments reflect a view that maritime chokepoints shape geopolitical options and that shifts in control over these routes could influence international responses.
Meanwhile in the United States, discussions have intensified around Iran and its regional influence. Officials have accused Tehran of backing Houthi movements that target commercial shipping in the Red Sea, alleging that Tehran supplies intelligence to assist these attacks. As the narrative unfolds, the cooperation between Tehran aligned factions and offensive maneuvers in key sea lanes has drawn significant attention from policymakers and security analysts alike.
Reports indicate that Houthis previously stated an intent to threaten merchant shipping in the Red Sea on a regular schedule, highlighting ongoing concerns about maritime security and the potential for disruptions to global trade. The cadence of such announcements has underscored the perceived seriousness of the threat and prompted discussions about responses from international partners and regional actors. Attribution for these claims is attributed to multiple sources including official statements and monitoring discussions, with ongoing analysis by regional observers and external observers alike.