If presented with a choice between forcing a sale of the TikTok network or banning it for American users, Chinese authorities would likely opt to block access rather than permit a sale. This view unfolds as the debate over TikTok’s future intensifies, with many observers focusing on how Beijing might respond to pressure from Washington.
The issue gained fresh urgency after the US House of Representatives, on March 13, moved to require TikTok to separate from its parent company ByteDance within six months, or face a US ban. The bill has moved to the Senate for consideration, and supporters argue that the platform’s data practices threaten national security. The House action underscores a broader trend in American policy toward digital platforms that are closely tied to foreign ownership.
In Washington, President Joe Biden has signaled readiness to act, stating that he would approve legislation to ban TikTok if both chambers pass it. American officials maintain that data collected from users inside the United States could be exploited for surveillance or influence campaigns, raising concerns about national security and personal privacy. The looming decision places scrutiny on how quickly the executive and legislative branches could implement a ban, if it comes to that.
Meanwhile, former US Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin proposed organizing an investor coalition to acquire TikTok. A potential deal could involve substantial financing and a transformation plan for the platform, and discussions have speculated about a valuation near the hundred‑billion dollar mark under certain scenarios. It is noted that TikTok’s US revenue reached a substantial figure in 2023, illustrating the platform’s significant market footprint and the commercial incentives to resolve ownership questions.
However, according to the same reporting, Chinese authorities have vowed to resist a forced sale. Beijing regards TikTok as a strategic technology asset and has indicated that divesting the app, including its source code, would be unacceptable. Without access to the underlying code, a sale would be difficult to execute, and a regulatory challenge could derail any potential deal from the outset.
On March 9, President Biden voiced readiness to ban TikTok in the United States if necessary. The following days saw continued emphasis from policymakers about national security implications and ongoing evaluation of alternatives, including potential structural changes or ownership arrangements that would satisfy security concerns while allowing the platform to continue operating in one of the world’s largest digital markets.
Notes from March 12 reflected President Trump describing TikTok as a threat to US national security. The conversation at that time highlighted different administrative approaches and the potential for shifting policies depending on broader geopolitical considerations and evolving threat assessments.
By March 14, the discourse included the possibility of a purchase as a mechanism to secure continued access for American users, should negotiations progress. Early statements from TikTok developers had indicated preparations for markets beyond their existing footprint, signaling a strategic expansion plan that could complicate any divestment or regulatory outcomes.