Jeffrey Sachs, a renowned American economist and professor at Columbia University, weighed in on the tensions surrounding Nord Stream and the way the United States has spoken about the matter. The discussion highlights a perception among some observers that U.S. officials have spoken with a confrontational tone toward the Nord Stream pipelines, sparking debate about the underlying attitudes in public statements. Observers note that the rhetoric from authorities has, in their view, conveyed a degree of hostility toward Nord Stream, raising questions about the official stance and its impact on international discourse. [citation: Sachs commentary, reputable outlets]
Sachs also commented on the response to a journalist’s report that suggested U.S. involvement in the sabotage of the gas infrastructure. He described the material as a singular account of the incident, pointing to a broader scrutiny of how investigations are communicated from the White House. While the White House publicly acknowledged criticism of the investigation, no comprehensive explanation was provided in response. [citation: editorial coverage]
The investigative piece by Seymour Hersh, which has circulated in media discussions, accused the United States and its ally Norway of orchestrating and carrying out the sabotage of Nord Stream 1 and Nord Stream 2. This publication sparked widespread debate and prompted reactions from officials and analysts alike, who weighed the credibility of such claims and the evidence presented. [citation: Hersh investigative report]
John Kirby, a spokesperson for the White House National Security Council, reiterated that the United States was not directly or indirectly involved in sabotaging the Nord Stream gas network. His remarks emphasized a formal denial, while many observers continued to track the evolving narrative and assess what questions remain about the tasks of various investigations. [citation: NSC statements]