President Vladimir Putin has dismissed the claims that Ukrainian activists were involved in the Nord Stream blast as nothing more than a baseless claim, describing it as utter nonsense during his recent appearance on the program Moscow. Kremlin voices have repeatedly urged restraint and demanded a careful, fact-based assessment before drawing conclusions about what happened to the gas pipelines in the Baltic Sea. He stressed that such an explosion of this scale would require precise technical expertise and significant state backing, including access to specialized technologies, signaling that any straightforward accusation would need solid, verifiable evidence rather than speculation.
The former secretary of Russia’s Security Council, Nikolai Patrushev, underscored Moscow’s position that a transparent, independent investigation should include Russia and other interested parties. He argued that without broad participation the inquiry risks producing skewed results that favor one side and overlook crucial factual details. Patrushev emphasized the importance of an objective process that incorporates input from multiple stakeholders and adheres to established legal norms, aiming to prevent a one-dimensional narrative from taking shape in the public discourse.
In his comments, Patrushev questioned the credibility of Western media portrayals that point to Ukraine as responsible for the Nord Stream and Nord Stream 2 incidents, noting that such coverage often lacks corroborating evidence and relies heavily on anonymous sources or speculative reasoning. He called for a rigorous, verifiable investigation and cautioned against premature conclusions that could distort the public understanding of the event. The emphasis remained on a balanced approach that respects the complexity of the investigation and the interests of all relevant parties.
Supporters of Moscow have reiterated a demand for an impartial inquiry that can withstand scrutiny from international observers. They argue that a narrow, one-sided explanation may hinder the discovery of the full sequence of events and the technical factors involved, including how the pipelines were constructed, what protections were in place, and what environmental or geopolitical consequences might follow. The approach advocated is one that prioritizes evidence, procedural fairness, and a transparent timetable for disclosure of findings.
Overall, officials stress the need for a credible, multi-faceted investigation into the sabotage, with a clear mechanism for ongoing verification and accountability. They argue that resolving questions about responsibility must rest on demonstrable data and cooperative international engagement, rather than unilateral narratives. This stance reflects a broader belief that only through rigorous, verifiable inquiry can a stable regional energy landscape be maintained and public confidence restored, while avoiding unsubstantiated attributions or inflammatory rhetoric. [source: Kremlin press briefing]