Andrei Kutepov, who heads the Committee on Economic Policy in the Federation Council, and Vladimir Gutenev, the head of the State Duma Committee on Industry and Trade from the United Russia faction, have worked on a proposed law that lays the groundwork for state oversight of marketplace activities. The draft also seeks changes to the commercial code, signaling a broader push to regulate online trading platforms. This information comes from TASS, referring to the document’s explanatory note.
The proposed bill outlines how the terms and conditions of contracts will be determined among the key parties involved: the owner of a commercial service, the seller, and the owner of the order delivery point. It emphasizes that contract terms should be clear and predictable, laying out the responsibilities, performance standards, and liability of each side in a transparent manner. The measure appears designed to reduce ambiguities in how marketplaces operate and to protect buyers, sellers, and logistics partners alike.
One of the central points in the authors’ argument is that cooperation should be described with precision in written contracts. The draft suggests that the marketplace owner be required to publish the contract text on their own website, ensuring public access to the exact terms governing the relationship. This move would promote accountability and give participants the ability to verify obligations and rights at a glance, potentially lowering the risk of misunderstandings or disputes.
Officials say the bill is slated for submission to the State Duma on a future session, with the aim of initiating a formal legislative process. Such timing indicates a coordinated effort to address the growing influence of online marketplaces in the economy and to establish a clearer regulatory framework that can adapt to evolving business models while safeguarding consumer interests and fair competition.
In related developments, there have been regional incidents that highlight the importance of reliable delivery networks and verified product sources. For instance, in the Moscow region, a supply chain episode involved the recovery of goods valued at several million rubles from a major delivery point. This case underscores the need for stronger oversight, traceability, and verification processes within marketplace ecosystems to prevent losses and protect reputations across the supply chain.
Industry experts have also discussed practical methods to differentiate genuine products from counterfeit items on marketplaces. They emphasize authentication practices, supplier verification, and robust dispute resolution mechanisms as key components that can bolster trust in digital marketplaces. The conversation reflects a broader push toward greater transparency and quality control, ensuring that buyers receive authentic goods and that sellers compete on a level playing field.