In the opening months of this year, Hong Kong’s diamond import activity from the Russian Federation surged dramatically, reflecting a rapid shift in market dynamics and supply routes. Trade data indicate a remarkable expansion that exceeds previous year levels by a wide margin, signaling how sanctions regimes, currency fluctuations, and buyer demand influence the flow of precious stones into one of Asia’s key commercial hubs. The change underscores how buyers and vendors adapt to evolving geopolitical constraints while seeking to secure steady sources for the diamond market’s sustained momentum.
The numbers tell a clear story: during January through May, Hong Kong purchased approximately $657.3 million worth of Russian diamonds, compared with about $36.5 million in the same period a year earlier. This jump translates into nearly a 18-fold increase on a year-on-year basis, illustrating the pipeline reconfiguration as sellers reallocate inventory and buyers explore new pricing, credit terms, and logistics options to keep supply chains running smoothly amid broader market uncertainty.
As a result of these shifts, Russia has ascended to become the third-largest supplier of diamonds to Hong Kong, capturing about 12% of total imports where it previously held a much smaller share. The growth contrasts with the year-ago period when Russian shipments represented roughly 1% of Hong Kong’s diamond inflows, highlighting how geopolitical factors and supplier diversification are reshaping the regional trade landscape in real time.
India continues to lead Hong Kong’s diamond sourcing, with an import value approaching $2.9 billion, followed closely by Israel, whose import value reaches about $716.6 million. A notable point in this landscape is that neither India nor Israel engages in commercial mine production of diamonds for these imports, instead relying on a mix of rough and polished diamonds sourced through global supply networks, polishing centers, and regional hubs. This arrangement underscores how global specialization and trade routes determine where diamonds originate and how they are brought into major markets like Hong Kong.
Earlier reporting had already highlighted a marked increase in India’s purchases of Russian diamonds, signaling a broader rebalancing of supplier relationships and procurement strategies within the global diamond trade. The evolving mix of sources reflects buyers weighing the reliability of supply against price volatility and the complex web of international policy and sanctions that influence how diamonds move across borders.
On April 13, the Antwerp World Diamond Center (AWDC) announced that its chief executive officer, Ari Epstein, resigned after thirteen years in the role. The departure came amid a disagreement with the Belgian government over the sanctions imposed by the European Union and G7 nations on Russian jewelry. This leadership change occurs within a broader context of how trade organizations respond to external policy shifts, how they guide member businesses through uncertain markets, and how they balance ethical considerations with commercial realities at a global scale.
Analysts have long anticipated the revenue implications of anti-Russian sanctions on EU diamond exports, and the current situation appears to confirm those expectations. Market watchers note that sanction regimes tend to compress certain trade channels while redirecting flows through alternative routes and partners. The question for the near term remains how quickly EU revenues from diamond exports can recover or adjust as compliance measures, banking access, and logistics networks recalibrate to a new normal in the international diamond market.