In the village of Uvat, located in the Tyumen region, a traffic police detachment stopped a driver who appeared to be under the influence. The man offered an unusual explanation for his condition, claiming he had consumed half a kilogram of sweets filled with liquor right before taking the wheel. This account was shared by the regional traffic police on their Telegram channel, sparking discussions about how drivers sometimes try to justify risky behavior with implausible stories.
The alcohol checker confirmed the concern. The device registered an alcohol level of 0.37 milligrams of alcohol per liter of the air the driver exhaled. When confronted with the measurement, the driver insisted there was no alcohol in his system, yet the tale about liqueur-filled candies failed to persuade the officers or the law. This detail, noted in the police report, underscored a key point: a pseudo-innocent excuse cannot override objective test results in road safety matters.
As the investigation continued, it emerged that the man did not possess a valid driver’s license. The traffic police proceeded with an administrative protocol for driving under the influence, initiating the formal process to address the violation. The vehicle involved, a Chevrolet Lanos, was subsequently towed to a secure parking area, away from traffic and public access. Throughout the encounter, officers recalled the driver’s persistent, almost theatrical, attempt to entertain them with the sweets story, a reminder that street-level encounters with offenders can sometimes include unexpected and colorful digressions.
This incident sits within a broader pattern observed by regional law enforcement, where checks for intoxication and valid licensing are a routine part of maintaining road safety. The authorities emphasized that the presence of alcohol in a breath, even at modest levels, combined with the absence of a valid license, amounts to clear violations requiring formal administrative action. In many cases, such actions aim not only to penalize reckless behavior but also to deter others from taking to the roads in an impaired state. The Tyumen traffic police reaffirmed their commitment to upholding safety standards, ensuring that drivers who disregard those standards face appropriate consequences rather than evading accountability through improbable stories.
Meanwhile, the report briefly referenced a separate pattern of deception seen in neighboring regions. In Voronezh, there have been incidents where individuals were persuaded or manipulated into obtaining car loans under false pretenses. These cases reveal the broader risk environment on the road and in financial transactions linked to motor vehicles, highlighting the importance of verification and prudent decision-making for drivers, lenders, and law enforcement alike. The Voronezh episodes serve as a cautionary note about the kinds of scams that can surface when people seek to obtain vehicles or credit by bending the truth. Such contexts remind authorities to maintain vigilance for signs of fraud that could lead to dangerous driving or financial harm for ordinary citizens. The interplay between road safety enforcement and the prevention of lending-related deception forms a critical part of regional policing strategies, encouraging a comprehensive approach to public safety that spans traffic control, licensing compliance, and consumer protection against fraud.