The Australian safety authority ANCAP has released an official assessment of the Tank 300 SUV, focusing on its passive protection performance as the model prepares for potential markets in Russia and beyond. The evaluation delves into how the vehicle behaves in real world crash scenarios and what occupants can expect in terms of safeguard against injuries. The findings are a key reference for buyers who value crashworthiness and overall occupant protection when considering this mid sized SUV family from a brand expanding its footprint in international markets.
In the published crash test results, the Tank 300 achieved a five star overall rating, underscoring strong performance across a range of protective categories. The assessment indicates that the vehicle provides approximately 88 percent protection for adult occupants, a measure that reflects restraint system effectiveness, structural integrity, and injury risk reduction across critical body regions. For younger passengers, the tested configuration delivers around 89 percent protection, highlighting the effectiveness of child restraint provisions and seating geometry designed to minimize injury risk in the event of a collision. Pedestrian protection also shows promise with an 81 percent score, while auxiliary electronic safety systems, including active safety and driver assistance components, are rated at about 85 percent, indicating a robust set of features that support lane keeping, collision warning, and automated braking under various conditions.
However, the assessment notes a concern in frontal impact scenarios related to vehicle compatibility during head-to-head crashes. In these events, the Tank 300 was given the highest possible penalty points for compatibility, signaling that an oncoming vehicle would pose a heightened risk to its occupants in certain crash configurations. This highlights the importance of considering fleet mix and typical traffic patterns in target markets, where vehicle sizes and designs may differ from those used in testing. The report also points out a vulnerability in rear seat occupant protection, specifically regarding head and chest protection for passengers seated behind the front row. Improving the protection system in this area could lead to meaningful gains in overall safety for rear passengers, which is particularly relevant for families and multi passenger use cases commonly seen in urban driving and longer journeys alike.
Tests follow standardized procedures for evaluating frontal impact at 50 kilometers per hour, side impact at 60 kilometers per hour, and side impact protection when the vehicle is impacted near the pole or during a pole side impact at 32 kilometers per hour. These benchmarks help ensure that the results are comparable to other models in the same class and across different markets, enabling consumers to gauge relative safety levels against peers. The Tank 300’s performance in these tests aligns with regional expectations for this segment, providing a credible level of protection for a broad range of accident scenarios that drivers may encounter.
In related safety testing, a number of compact crossovers previously available in the United States have faced scrutiny under a newer IIHS crash test protocol designed to account for rear seat occupant protection more comprehensively. The latest evaluations reveal that several popular models failed to meet the enhanced criteria when it came to safeguarding passengers in the rear seat, reinforcing the growing emphasis on rear passenger safety as a key component of overall vehicle safety. This context helps explain why manufacturers, including those building the Tank 300, continue to refine restraint systems, structural design, and occupant protection features to address evolving testing standards and consumer expectations in Canada, the United States, and other markets where safety is a central purchasing criterion. Source: ANCAP crash test documentation and IIHS protocol summaries, with independent expert reviews for context across regions.