Electric scooters and other personal mobility devices must be registered with the traffic police. This stance was outlined during a press briefing at NSN’s center, where Anton Shaparin, vice president of the National Automobile Association, explained that any vehicle lacking a license plate has no rightful place on public roads. The message was clear: proper registration is a prerequisite for lawful operation, regardless of the type of device.
During the briefing, Shaparin highlighted a simple registration process. He noted that the state offers a straightforward path through the government services portal to obtain and assign state registration marks. Once an owner completes this process, the same registration marks can be placed on the device, whether it is an electric scooter, a moped, or another form of personal mobility equipment. The registration system focuses on ensuring every vehicle used on public streets is properly identified, which helps authorities track and regulate usage more effectively.
In related legislative discussions, State Duma deputy Alexander Yakubovsky advocated for stricter usage rules, arguing that individuals under 16 should not operate electric scooters. He suggested that potential riders should pass a knowledge exam on road rules and obtain a driver’s license before using these devices. This perspective emphasizes safety and accountability, aligning with broader efforts to ensure that users possess a basic understanding of traffic regulations and safe riding practices.
Further contributions came from Vitaly Efimov, a member of the State Duma Transport Committee, who proposed at the end of August to limit the maximum speed of electric scooters to 10 kilometers per hour. The proposal reflects a concern for pedestrian safety and the potential risks associated with higher speeds in mixed-traffic environments. Debates like this illustrate how regulators are weighing convenience against safety in shaping future rules for personal mobility devices.
There has also been discussion about applying the rights associated with the “M” category to electric scooters. This would formalize the status of certain personal mobility devices within the framework of existing driver licensing and vehicle operation rules. Advocates argue that extending established categories could streamline enforcement and improve rider accountability, while opponents caution against over-regulation that might stifle innovation or limit access for urban residents who rely on these devices for daily transportation.
Overall, the regulatory environment for electric scooters and similar SIMs is evolving. The emphasis is on clear identification, responsible operation, and safety-driven restrictions when necessary. As cities continue to adapt to growing numbers of riders, policymakers are likely to refine registration procedures, age requirements, licensing expectations, and speed limits. The aim is to create a balanced framework that protects public safety while preserving the practical benefits of personal mobility devices for urban travel.