Recent polling in Russia shows broad public support for penalties aimed at drunk operation of personal mobility devices, including electric scooters. The survey, conducted via the Superjob service, indicates that a large majority backs punishment for riding PIMs while under the influence. Specifically, 77 percent of Russians support the initiative, with only about one in nine respondents, or 11 percent, opposed to it. This pattern suggests a strong call from the public for stricter enforcement to ensure safety on roads and public spaces.
Gender differences emerge in the data. Women appear more supportive of penalties for intoxicated PIM operation, with 86 percent agreement, compared to 70 percent among men. This gap aligns with broader trends in risk awareness and protective behavior on urban transport options, where perceived safety can influence attitudes toward regulation and penalties.
Legislative steps accompany the public sentiment. A bill on penalties for drunk driving has been prepared by the Legislative Institute of the Federation Council. Senators propose amendments to the Code of Administrative Offenses to introduce fines specific to PIM intoxication incidents. The proposed framework envisions fines ranging from a minimum of 20,000 rubles to a maximum of 30,000 rubles, establishing a clearer, codified consequence for violations and aiming to deter risky behavior among riders of personal mobility devices.
Beyond the topic of penalties, public discourse has also touched on transport preferences and usage patterns across Russia. It has been noted that many Russians previously preferred other modes of transport for daily needs and entertainment, shaping opinions about how best to balance mobility with safety. As policymakers consider penalties, they also weigh the overall impact on urban transport ecosystems, including accessibility and convenience for residents who rely on various mobility options in different regions.
Observations from industry commentators and public commentators alike highlight a trend toward choosing conventional transport when personal safety is a priority. Some have suggested that initiatives promoting responsible riding, coupled with penalties for intoxication, could complement broader campaigns focused on road safety and rider education. In this context, authorities may seek to align penalties with educational efforts, ensuring that penalties serve as a deterrent while also encouraging riders to make safer choices. The evolving policy discussion reflects an ongoing effort to address the practical realities of PIM usage in cities and towns across the country, balancing personal freedom with collective safety concerns and the needs of pedestrians and other road users. The outcome of these measures will depend on implementation details, enforcement consistency, and public reception as the regulatory environment for PIMs takes shape across federal and regional jurisdictions.