In a move that has sparked debate about urban traffic and taxi service operations, a deputy chairman of the State Duma from the Liberal Democratic Party proposed a clear change to where taxis can park and how long they may stay in residential areas. The idea emerged after a formal letter addressed to the head of the country’s traffic safety authority drew attention to the issue. The proposal centers on restricting parking by taxi vehicles in living neighborhoods and limiting their stationary time to an initial 30 minutes. This duration is meant to cover the typical moments of picking up and discharging passengers, including those with reduced mobility or those carrying bulky luggage, while maintaining the pace and safety of residential streets.
According to the proposal, drivers who violate these rules would face fines, and their vehicles would be redirected to designated parking facilities. The deputy expressed readiness to push forward amendments to the existing Administrative Offenses legislation to codify these changes and ensure consistent enforcement across municipalities. The core aim is to balance the convenience of residents with the needs of taxi services, underscoring the importance of accessible transport options for people with limited mobility and for those who travel with substantial luggage during peak periods.
Earlier discussions in the same legislative body entertained the idea of easing the burden on taxi drivers by not charging them for parking overnight in the capital. The conversation highlighted ongoing concerns about curb space competition, urban noise, and traffic flow, and it reflected a broader effort to modernize how cities regulate on-street parking for service vehicles while protecting the daily routines of residents. The current proposal builds on that framework, seeking to clarify when and where taxis may stop and how long such stops may last, with an emphasis on safety, accessibility, and efficient city operations. Proponents argue that clear rules can reduce congestion, curb abrupt stopping, and improve the overall experience for passengers who rely on taxis as a primary mode of transport during late hours or in dense neighborhoods. Critics warn against overly rigid restrictions that might reduce service availability or increase wait times for riders who depend on rapid pickups in busy districts. The discussion continues to reflect the tension between mobility services and urban livability, with stakeholders calling for practical solutions that consider both driver livelihoods and resident quality of life. In the end, the debate centers on practical enforcement, city planning priorities, and the role of regulations in shaping how urban spaces are used by taxi fleets, dwellers, and visitors alike.