The recently proposed dangerous driving regulation has drawn attention for its gaps and ambiguities. This portal, Quto.ru, has hosted discussions from automotive experts who remind readers that in the autumn session the State Duma plans to review amendments to the Code of Administrative Offenses. These changes could introduce penalties for dangerous driving and reshape how traffic violations are handled nationwide.
Industry specialists warn that approving a new rule without precise norms could open doors to corruption and uneven enforcement. When authorities push for penalties, clear guidance matters as much as the sanction itself. Without well-defined standards, there is a risk that rules will be applied inconsistently, undermining public trust and complicating legitimate road safety efforts.
Anton Shaparin, vice president of the National Automobile Association, commented on the potential for improper incentives to influence traffic policing. He noted that corruption persists in some criminal cases initiated by traffic police, and that the new law could unintentionally widen those opportunities if safeguards are not built in.
Andrei Ivanov, head of the MotoRussia association, shared a related concern. He pointed out that the broad scope of the proposed regulation could cover many common motorcycle movements, bringing them under the same framework. He also warned that relying on automated systems or artificial intelligence to monitor traffic could raise questions about accuracy, transparency, and accountability in enforcement decisions.
Ivánov underscored a principle heard in many road-safety debates: every suspected offense should be examined by a human investigator. He emphasized that a living person must verify each case to protect fairness and prevent misapplication of the rules.
Earlier reporting indicated that the Duma plans to consider a bill this autumn that would establish penalties for dangerous driving. If enacted, the law could take effect in 2025. The regulation would define reckless driving as actions such as failing to yield to a vehicle with the right of way, making unsafe lane changes in heavy traffic, not maintaining a safe following distance, and improper lane occupancy. For a first violation, fines are projected to range from three thousand to five thousand rubles, with repeated violations potentially leading to temporary deprivation of driving rights for one to three months.
Proponents of the initiative argue that aggressive driving is a major contributor to road crashes. They claim up to eighty percent of incidents involve some form of aggressive behavior behind the wheel, though supporters acknowledge the need for precise enforcement criteria and reliable assessment methods to avoid misapplication.
In related developments, public conversations have also touched on potential adjustments to car recycling fees, with stakeholders asking when and where hearings might take place. These discussions reflect a broader push to modernize road safety and vehicle regulations in the face of evolving traffic patterns and technological changes.