Reports circulating on a Telegram channel named Shot. Exam show a LiXiang car camera rolling along a cemetery road. The clip captures figures that resemble people who are not physically present, and these shapes appear on the vehicle’s multimedia display as the car continues its passage. The video has drawn attention because the apparent ghosts occur in a place associated with quiet streets and stone markers, making the moment feel eerie to viewers. Observers note that the car’s camera system was operating in normal daylight conditions, with no fog or rain that would typically distort a scene. The footage has sparked questions about what a modern automotive camera can see and how processing algorithms translate raw sensor data into on-screen images. Vehicle cameras rely on a network of sensors, processors, and display software that work together to present a real-time view to the driver. When any link in that chain misinterprets what the sensors capture, the display may show artifacts that resemble people or other objects, even if none exist at that moment.
LiXiang, the Chinese automaker behind the model, stated that the episode is not paranormal but a fault in software algorithms. In its assessment, the hardware acted normally and the problem lay with how the processing software rendered the scene on the screen. The company emphasized that the issue was strictly about the visual display and did not indicate a failure in other safety or driving-assistance functions. In everyday terms, the cameras were capturing data correctly; the anomaly appeared only in the interpretive layer that converts observations into the images shown to the occupant. This distinction matters because it points to a bug in the user interface rather than a fault in the car’s core sensing or control systems.
As the automotive world follows recall news from Russia and beyond, attention has focused on other software-driven issues that have affected high-end models. For example, premium Bentley Bentayga W12 SUVs have faced a recall in Russia, with automaker notices describing a risk tied to the fuel delivery network. The recall highlights how design choices and software-driven diagnostics intersect with hardware components in modern vehicles, and why manufacturers must address both software integrity and hardware resilience to preserve safety and reliability.
Under the recall, 473 Bentayga models manufactured between 2017 and 2022 are included. The campaign calls for a thorough inspection of the fuel pumps located in the fuel tank and for replacement of any parts that show signs of overheating in their electrical connectors. Overheating of these contacts can cause a failure of the fuel supply system and, in the worst case, lead to unexpected immobilization of the vehicle on the road. The manufacturer states that the new components installed during the repairs are not subject to the same overheating risk. In this context, owners in Russia were asked to bring their cars to authorized service centers for checks, and the recall notice serves as a cautionary example for similar models in other regions where fuel-pump assemblies are used.
Another update in the region involves the Lada Vesta, where software-related problems have surfaced in earlier assessments. While this topic is less dramatic than a haunting in a cemetery, it underscores how software issues can ripple across a broad range of models. In the Vesta case, engineers have reviewed the software stack to ensure that firmware updates do not introduce new display anomalies or misinterpretations of sensor data. Auto makers in Russia and neighboring markets routinely publish such notices to prevent unexpected system outages, and the discussion highlights how software governance is becoming a central part of vehicle safety.
For owners and potential buyers in Canada and the United States, the events underscore the ongoing importance of monitoring official recall notices and ensuring that vehicles receive the latest software and firmware updates. Regulatory bodies and manufacturers often coordinate to issue voluntary recalls when a defect in electrical systems, fuel supply hardware, or software can affect safety or reliability. Consumers are advised to check with local dealers for recall campaigns, confirmation of eligibility, and the schedule for any required service updates. The overall pattern is that software, sensors, and display systems are integral to modern mobility, and their proper maintenance safeguards a smoother, safer driving experience.
While the cemetery footage captured attention for its eerie visuals, the practical takeaway is clearer: car cameras and their display pipelines are sensitive to how data is processed and shown. Tech teams emphasize robust validation of software in the camera chain and attentive testing across varied lighting and urban-rural mixes. The episode also illustrates how emergency communications and recall frameworks work, providing a real-world example of how brands communicate issues and how customers respond with timely checks.
There is a growing recognition across markets that software safety is as important as mechanical reliability. Reports of ghostly figures on a display remind drivers and technicians that even sophisticated perception systems can produce misleading visuals if the underlying algorithms are not perfectly tuned. By comparing separate recalls from Bentley and Lada with the LiXiang episode, readers can appreciate how different automakers approach risk management, quality control, and consumer protection in the age of connected vehicles.