Haval Dargo vs Mitsubishi Outlander: Comprehensive crossover comparison in North America

No time to read?
Get a summary

A detailed comparison of two crossovers: the latest Haval Dargo and the Mitsubishi Outlander, which debuted ten years ago, can be found here.

Get on the rollers

For four-wheel drive vehicles, rolling platform tests simulate a surface with no friction. The first step is to roll off two platforms placed under the front wheels. Both models responded immediately.

Next, the test shifts to a diagonal approach. One platform sits under a front wheel, the other diagonally beneath the rear. The Outlander struggled to clear the obstacle in one transmission mode, failing to pull away.

The Dargo showed greater capability. In normal and snow modes the momentum did not suffice to free the contacting wheels from the rollers. In Mud mode, the Haval completed the move. The verdict is that the wheel-lock imitation works more reliably on the Dargo.

tribesmen

About a year earlier, three diamonds introduced a new generation of the Outlander. Built on the Nissan CMF-C/D platform, the same underpinnings support the new X-Trail. The interior offers more space, and equipment has pushed the Outlander ahead of rivals: adaptive cruise control, virtual tidying, three-zone climate control, and optional semi-aniline leather seats. The gasoline version now uses a Nissan 2.5 engine delivering 181 hp, while the hybrid retains a 2.4 unit aided by electric motors.

Though a new generation Outlander is anticipated by year end, its departure has been delayed, leaving hopeful anticipation for a future release.

Haval Dargo

Haval Dargo

Haval KuGou

Haval H-Dog

The Dargo does not have a direct predecessor or successor within the lineup, but the brand offers several models with a similar silhouette. KuGou sits one tier below with a body length of 4520 mm and a larger trunk capacity of 493 liters. The basic 1.5 turbo variant produces 150 horsepower and is front-wheel drive, with an option to push power to 184 hp depending on the 4×4 setup.

H-Dog sits higher in the range with a length of 4705 mm. This hybrid uses a 1.5 turbo paired with two electric motors, yielding a total output of 326 horsepower.

MANUFACTURERS DETAILS:

Haval Dargo Mitsubishi Outlander
Roadworthy / gross weight 1815 / 2157 kg 1585 / 2210 kg
Acceleration time 0-100 km/h 10.0 sec 10.5 s
maximum speed 180 km/h 198 km/h
Fuel / fuel reserve AI-92, AI-95 / 60 l AI-92, AI-95 / 60 l
Fuel Economy: City / Highway / Combined Cycle 12.0 / 7.5 / 9.2 l/100 km 10.4 / 6.8 / 8.1 l / 100 km
ENGINE
Kind of petrol petrol
Place front, transverse front, transverse
Configuration / number of valves R4 / 16 R4 / 16
Working volume 1998 cm³ 2360 cm³
Current 141 kW / 192 hp at 5600–6300 rpm 123 kW / 167 hp at 6000 rpm
Couple 320 Nm at 1500-4000 rpm 222 Nm at 4100 rpm
TRANSFER
drive type full full
Transfer P7 CVT
Gear ratios: I / II / III / IV / V / VI / VII / zx 3.69 / 2.68 / 1.68 / 1.02 / 0.83 / 0.80 / 0.64 / 3.60 2.63–0.38/1.96
headgear 3.94-4.73 6.03
CHASSIS
Suspension: front / rear MacPherson / multilink MacPherson / multilink
Send rack, with EUR rack, with EUR
Brakes: front / rear vented disk / disk vented disk / disk
Ties 235/65 R18 225/55 R18

SERVICE IN NUMBERS

Frequency of maintenance Guarantee Dealers
HAVAL DARGO 15,000 km or 12 months 3 years or 150,000 km 116
MITSUBISHI OUTLANDER 15,000 km or 12 months 3 years or 100,000 km 111

* TO-1 has been performed at 10,000 km.

geometric patency

HAVAL DARGO MITSUBISHI OUTLANDER
clearance
a 185mm 190mm
b 215mm 210mm
c 210mm 210mm
Corner
25.5° 22.5°
31.0° 21.5°
18.5° 18.0°

THICKNESS OF THE PAINT, micron

HAVAL DARGO MITSUBISHI OUTLANDER
cap 110-135 110-130
front wing 110–120 100-120
rear fender 110–120 100-120
front door 100–115 100–115
Back door 115–120 110–120
tailgate 115–125 115–120

EXPERT RATING OF CARS

Fashion model Haval Dargo Mitsubishi Outlander
Driver’s workplace
Chair eight eight
Governing Bodies eight 9
Review 9 9
Salon
the front of 9 eight
Backside 9 9
Trunk 7 9
Driving Performance
dynamics 9 eight
brakes eight 9
Manageability eight 9
Comfort
Noise 9 eight
Smooth operation eight eight
climate 9 eight
Adaptation to Russia
geometric patency 9 9
Maintenance 9 9
Exploitation eight eight
Mid-term review 8.53 8.46
Behavior off the road
Power-to-weight ratio eight eight
Endurance eight 9
Suspension moves eight eight
Total score 8.44 8.44
  • “Behind the wheel” can also be read in Telegram.
No time to read?
Get a summary
Previous Article

Barcelona Solves Celta Challenge in Tough Home Test

Next Article

Natural Ant Remedies: Safe, Affordable Ways to Reclaim Your Home