Georgy Karlov, a member of the State Duma’s Defense Committee, addressed online chatter about the seizure of civilian equipment for a special operation. He dismissed worries about a supposed “mobilization of machines” as false rumors and asserted that such a scenario has not even been on the agenda of the State Duma. There are neither conditions nor necessity for it, he emphasized, and the topic has not been raised within the Defense Committee or the Duma as a whole. People should move about freely, drive, and operate within the bounds of the law, Karlov stated, as cited in recent reports.
According to those statements, much of what is circulating on the web consists of rumors, hearsay, and misunderstandings. There is no talk of such measures within the walls of the Duma, at least at this time. No preconditions exist, no necessity has been identified, and the matter is not under discussion in the Defense Committee or the State Duma. The public is advised to remain calm and continue with daily activities in accordance with legal norms.
Previously raised concerns about private vehicle impoundments have been linked to mobilization contexts. Legally, the framework prioritizes heavy vehicles and specialized equipment for state needs. For car owners seeking to understand possible repossession in a mobilization scenario, legal guidance has been sought to clarify the rights and obligations involved.
Order No. 151 from March 14, 2014, issued by the Ministry of Defense, outlines the list of vehicles supplied by the armed forces, other troops, military formations, and wartime special formations. This includes trucks, buses, trailers, tractors, and related equipment that may be involved in state operations. The document has been reviewed for historical context to comprehend what kinds of vehicles could be affected under extraordinary circumstances.
- Since 2018, there have been instances where passenger cars are mentioned in the lists, though not all are included. This nuance has been examined to understand how vehicle classes may be perceived in mobilization discussions.
- The topic has been discussed in various social channels, with some platforms carrying summaries of the official lists for public awareness.