Developed by FSUE NAMI, the system envisions multiple rescue scenarios ranging from vehicle damage to fires and even submersion incidents. It outlines practical steps tailored to different accident conditions, aiming to guide responders with clearer cues during emergencies. These scenarios are part of a broader effort to harmonize safety concepts across vehicle design and emergency response, ensuring that responders have a common framework to work from when incidents occur on roads and highways. [Citation: FSUE NAMI]
GOSTs introduce specialized markings that inform rescuers about the specific element they are dealing with in a wreck. Whether it is an electric car battery, a hydrogen fuel tank, or another critical component, these markings are designed to be applied to all parts of the vehicle thanks to standardized labeling. The intent is not to impose new obligations on manufacturers but to provide a consistent reference that responders can rely on across different vehicle makes and models. This approach reflects an emphasis on rapid assessment and safe handling, especially in scenarios where energy sources pose additional risks. [Citation: GOST standards]
Alongside color-coded indicators, warning symbols can denote hazards to human health or the environment and suggest appropriate extinguishing methods. Guidance may include the use of water, wet foam, dry foam, or powder, depending on the identified danger and the material involved. The goal is to equip rescue teams with actionable information that helps them choose the safest and most effective response while minimizing further harm to victims and bystanders. [Citation: safety protocols]
The framework also proposes specifying recommended areas for opening and cutting the car body, with consideration given to minimizing risks to occupants and rescuers alike. These recommendations are intended to streamline operations in complex crash scenarios, allowing teams to work more efficiently while preserving the integrity of potential victims. However, the introduction of such innovations has sparked debate among rescuers about how best to balance rapid intervention with the need for additional safety measures. [Citation: responder feedback]
Some responders express concern that these new details could distract from hands-on work. As Andrey Tumanov, a senior rescuer with the Centrospas unit of the Russian Emergency Department, noted in coverage by Kommersant, the practical value for frontline teams may vary. He pointed out that professional rescuers typically possess extensive technical training and a deep understanding of vehicle mechanics. The established, time-tested methods for freeing a trapped occupant remain effective regardless of whether the vehicle runs on gasoline, electricity, or hydrogen. The key difference, he argued, is ensuring that the energy source is managed safely to prevent unexpected releases. A preventive measure, such as a protective cover used on handlebars to prevent airbag deployment, is part of the long-standing toolkit. [Citation: Kommersant interview]
Autopsy or post-crash demonstrations can tempt unprepared bystanders to intervene inside a vehicle before rescuers arrive. This sort of interference raises the risk of additional injuries, particularly if an airbag is inadvertently triggered during extrication. Proper training emphasizes avoiding any action that could complicate the rescue or endanger the victim. The emphasis remains on allowing trained teams to execute proven procedures and to assess the vehicle’s energy sources with the appropriate equipment and precautions. [Citation: safety guidance]
In a broader context, manufacturers and emergency services have ongoing conversations about how to translate these markings into everyday practice on Canadian and American roads. The objective is to enhance situational awareness without introducing unnecessary steps that could slow response times. Real-world adoption depends on clear standards, continued training, and the practical experiences of rescue personnel who work under pressure in diverse conditions. The aim is to support quick decision-making, reduce risk, and improve outcomes for people involved in vehicle crashes. [Citation: industry discussions]