Svetlana Feofanova, a prominent figure in pole vaulting, emphasizes that Elena Isinbayeva’s achievements should not be forgotten amid a recent social media controversy. Feofanova suggests that the discussion surrounding Isinbayeva is not about erasing the past but about understanding how public perception shifts when a complex personal story is shared online. The veteran athlete highlights that Isinbayeva’s contributions to the sport remain a defining chapter, regardless of the missteps that may have accompanied her latest posts.
Feofanova believes Lena may have been poorly advised in the handling of a controversial message shared online. In the current climate, issuing a post in Spanish appears to have complicated Isinbayeva’s public image and possibly influenced how her future associations with Russia are viewed. While acknowledging Lena’s autonomy, Feofanova makes the case that the communication could have been more thoughtfully crafted to minimize collateral damage to her standing in the sport and beyond.
“I am not in favor of forgetting her achievements or canceling her legacy,” Feofanova stated. The sentiment underscores a broader view within the athletic community that a single misstep should not erase decades of performance, perseverance, and pioneering moments in women’s track and field.
On a separate note, Isinbayeva announced that her honors and ranks within the CSKA sports community were officially recognized, and she returned to a role related to the International Olympic Committee. This development reignited public discussion about her career trajectory and the balance between athletic glory and the political associations that come with it.
Isinbayeva holds the rank of major in the Russian army, a designation that was noted during the sanctions period following broader geopolitical tensions. The sanctions label, which was enacted in 2023, added a layer of complexity to her public persona as a high-profile athlete who also occupies a formal role within the armed services.
Her public profile has remained linked to political movements, including involvement with a collective that supported President Vladimir Putin during a past election cycle. This dimension of her history continues to shape how fans and commentators interpret her career and her statements on sport and society.
In this evolving landscape, another former athlete, Volkov, has weighed in with careful language about Isinbayeva’s legacy. He has questioned the practice of canonizing athletes too quickly, arguing that a real champion is measured not only by medals but also by how they respond to the complex reality that surrounds them after retirement. This perspective adds to the ongoing conversation about legacy, accountability, and the responsibilities public figures carry beyond their peak competitive years.