Football returns to the talk among national team players, yet the Rubiales case continues to cast a shadow over the international squad. An attempt to anchor the group came in the form of a prepared statement read aloud before the first training session. The note did not convince everyone, and despite the pressure, the federation chose to let those invited to speak share their views in interviews with various outlets, each presenting their own take and backing the group to differing degrees.
Among the topics scrutinized was the position of Dani Carvajal, a veteran of Real Madrid and one of the team’s most influential players. His statements became a focal point of debate. He acknowledged that the president’s behavior was inappropriate, yet he argued the matter of whether Jenni Hermoso was a victim must be determined by the facts. He emphasized that condemnation should wait for a final resolution rather than rush to judgment, a stance he voiced on Ondacero’s Radio Stadium program. Carvajal was scheduled to address the media before his departure to Tbilisi for a match against Georgia.
“Innocence is a constitutional right”
The first question centered on this line of thought. Carvajal contended that the friction around the incident should not erase the presumption of innocence, a fundamental right in the country’s constitution. He stressed that victims should not be presumed guilty without a definitive verdict and noted that the public discourse must not victimize individuals before a sentence is handed down.
He clarified that he never stated Hermoso was not a victim. Rather, he argued that the presumption of innocence must be respected. If Hermoso is enduring a difficult moment, solidarity should be shown to all involved, including the president, who will also face consequences if warranted by the process, he suggested in a later response.
Carvajal reflected on the challenge of securing unity within the squad. He explained that rallying 24 players around a common statement was hard, but it was done with sincere intent and in alignment with the team’s role and values. He acknowledged the intense media and social media reaction that followed and said he would refrain from further public comment, letting others decide how to respond as they see fit. The emphasis remained on football and team objectives above all else.
“I have a good sporting view of Rubiales”
The discussion turned to Rubiales, with the squad briefly reflecting on their views. Carvajal indicated that the group did not reach a unanimous stance but that the players collectively judged the situation and found common ground in their motivation to compete for Spain. He stated that his own view of Rubiales as a person and as a president was positive, noting professional treatment and support received during his time with the national team. For a player, anything that could help the squad in terms of championships and appearances has been invaluable, he added. He rejected any insinuations of misconduct by the federation and asserted that responsibility lies with those who led the process, not with the entire organization.
The locker room’s focus was immediately redirected toward the upcoming Georgia game. The team was set to travel that afternoon for a crucial fixture that carried significant weight in the campaign. Carvajal underscored the importance of staying concentrated on football and ensuring a solid performance on the field, steering discussions away from the controversy and toward the match itself. He explained that the prepared statement was a strategic step to prevent distractions and keep the broader conversation anchored in sport, even as the surrounding drama persisted.
“We defend the values of sports”
Carvajal articulated a broader commitment to the ideals of sport. He spoke about setting an example, acknowledging that both good and bad moments shape the public perception of a team. The aim was to keep the focus on professionalism and on what Spain represents as a national team, both on the field and in the media glare that accompanies major tournaments. He asserted that the squad seeks to project their best form, both in performance and in public conduct, as a reflection of the country’s shield and its footballing tradition. The players would not shy away from owning their responsibilities or from addressing missteps with candor, while continuing to pursue excellence in competition and representation of the sport’s values.
Carvajal noted that he did not witness any direct reaction from Rubiales after the players publicly voiced concerns about the situation. He stressed that the group had taken a stand against unacceptable actions and articulated a desire for forgiveness where appropriate. The overarching stance remained one of defending the core values of sport and of Spanish football, with a belief that leaders and teams alike must model integrity. The episode would not derail their plans for the Georgia encounter, and the squad planned to continue focusing on football while managing the surrounding controversy as best as possible.