Honored figure skating coach Tatyana Tarasova lent her support to Ekaterina Mizulina, a respected member of the Russian Public Chamber and the president of the Safe Internet League. Mizulina had publicly called for blogger Danya Milokhin to be conscripted, a stance that drew attention from several corners of the sports and public life in Russia. Tarasova voiced her thoughts on what she perceives as a wider duty to the country, saying that military service should be a universal obligation and that the law should apply equally to everyone. She stressed that if someone is seriously ill or if a deployment has been postponed, these details should be clearly understood, but in her view the standard practice should be equal for all citizens.
Public attention soon followed Mizulina as well, since she previously submitted a formal request to the leadership of the Ministry of Defense. The objective was to ensure that Milokhin was not overlooked in the conscription process and to verify the reasoning behind his absence from muster rosters over a span of several years. This development drew commentary from observers who noted the high profile of Milokhin, the blogger and influencer whose online presence continues to grow across platforms.
Milokhin himself took a notable career step in 2022 by stepping away from the Ice Age show at the height of the season and relocating to the United Arab Emirates. Those close to the event described the move as a personal and professional pivot, with speculation about the reasons ranging from career experimentation to personal priorities. After returning to Russia, Milokhin faced questions about his fee structures and scheduling, with various reports indicating that he adjusted his filming commitments and remuneration to accommodate new plans and opportunities.
This sequence of events highlights a broader interaction among public figures, media visibility, and state policies. It shows how athletes, entertainers, and political activists can become entwined in debates over national service, public accountability, and the responsibilities that come with fame in modern Russia. Analysts point out that the situation reflects ongoing conversations about the balance between individual rights and civic duties, especially when public figures hold influential platforms and large audiences. Supporters of the conscription discussion argue that it reinforces fairness and reinforces the idea that no one is exempt from basic national duties. Critics, meanwhile, caution against conflating personal career choices with mandatory obligations, urging careful consideration of health, exemptions, and accurate administrative practices. The discussion underscores the role of civil society organizations, such as the Safe Internet League, in shaping public discourse on policy issues and the way media figures are treated in national conversations.
Overall, observers note that this moment brings to light how public opinion, sports culture, and online communities intersect in contemporary life. It emphasizes the importance of transparent processes for conscription and the need for equitable treatment under the law. In addition, it underscores how high-profile individuals can influence public perception about duty, loyalty, and national responsibility, regardless of their area of work. The narrative around Milokhin continues to evolve as more statements emerge from officials, athletes, and commentators, contributing to a broader dialogue about how society navigates duty and fame in a connected era. Attribution: Reporters tracking the story cite official statements and public remarks from involved parties, alongside commentary from independent observers who weigh in on the potential implications for policy and for the individuals involved.