Rinat Bilyaletdinov, who previously led Lokomotiv Moscow, offered his assessment of Artem Dzyuba’s role within the squad. While expressing a measured viewpoint on a player who has not consistently earned minutes, the former coach noted that Dzyuba remains a valuable asset for the red-green club. He suggested that situations like limited playing time can arise from multiple factors, and even with reduced appearances, Dzyuba can still contribute meaningfully to the team’s dynamics. (Source: expert commentary on Lokomotiv Moscow)
When addressing changes in Lokomotiv’s approach, Bilyaletdinov pointed out that Dzyuba’s potential dip in physical conditioning could be one of several influences. The club itself must decide whether this development tilts the balance toward advantage or disadvantage. If Lokomotiv can collect points without Dzyuba, that would be a positive signal. Conversely, if the team experiences a winless spell or a prolonged drought, maintaining a neutral stance becomes necessary while evaluating options. The core message remains: Artem’s absence on the field might indicate he is not ready or that his form is under review, yet his overall usefulness to the squad endures, according to Bilyaletdinov.
Beyond individual fitness considerations, the coach emphasized a broader tactical shift. Lokomotiv has experimented with a system that relies less on a towering forward, exploring how the lineup functions when not anchored by a traditional center striker. Bilyaletdinov observed that, despite changes in the offensive setup, the overall game plan did not undergo a radical transformation. He highlighted the adaptation of Anton Miranchuk, who moved to the left wing, maintaining a regular spot in the starting XI. This repositioning brought a noticeable surge in the team’s tempo and flow, as Miranchuk began to influence the game more directly from the left flank and contribute to a fresh attacking rhythm.
The former national champion also offered remarks on the atmosphere surrounding Zenit’s fan base, noting a reaction that has drawn attention in recent discussions. While the comments reflect a broader dialogue about supporter fervor and its impact on clubs, the focus remains on how the squad leverages its resources and adjusts its formation to sustain competitive performance. The dialogue around these topics feeds into a larger narrative about how Lokomotiv manages player utilization, tactical experimentation, and the balancing act between individual readiness and collective objectives. (Source: remarks on fan dynamics and team strategy)