Government won’t back down on Rubiales: TAD review to determine temporary suspension
In a formal statement, the leader of the national federation, previously suspended by FIFA, asserted that despite political pressure and media scrutiny the matter must be resolved by the independence of the institutions involved. The message signaled a resolve to pursue due process and defend the integrity of the federation through established channels.
What is TAD and how does it function?
In this context, the discussion centers on the TAD, the administrative body involved in adjudicating disciplinary matters within sports governance. The aim is to ensure fair proceedings and accountability for all parties, without bias or prejudice, and to uphold standards of conduct across the sport when issues arise that require formal review.
Rubiales’ explanation
Speaking about the events of August last year, Rubiales acknowledged mistakes and offered a sincere apology. He emphasized that, regardless of strong emotions, leaders in sport are expected to demonstrate exemplary behavior, especially during moments of high visibility on the world stage. He reiterated that his intent was not to harm but to share a moment of mutual enthusiasm, stressing that the actions were consensual and based on a positive emotional exchange.
He claimed that documentation and evidence would continue to be provided to support his account. He asserted that what was shared represented his version of events and that it had been protected from the outset. The person involved maintained that the exchanges were spontaneous and joyful, not aggressive, and that the affection was mutual in both the embrace and the farewell, as later reflected in the ceremony surrounding the awards.
Rubiales noted that the federation acted through its Integrity department from the very start, and he cooperated fully with inquiries to clarify what happened. He expressed a willingness to participate in FIFA proceedings to defend his perspective and to engage in further events where his conduct could be questioned, aiming to demonstrate his character and commitment to sport’s integrity.
He expressed concern that some voices in the country, along with political actors and certain media outlets, were pressuring him rather than allowing justice to run its course with full guarantees. He described a period of intense public scrutiny, both nationally and worldwide, yet observed growing street and social media support for him as the narrative grew beyond its original scope.
Rubiales stressed that political pressure and media manipulation have influenced how the story has been told. He asserted confidence in the independence of the institutions involved and pledged to continue cooperating so that the truth emerges clearly. He underlined that the path to truth is through transparent procedures and the proper application of rules by the appropriate bodies.
As the case progressed, the body known as TAD opened a file and reviewed the decision by the CSD Board regarding temporary suspension. The decision indicated that there was no justification to classify the action as very serious, and Rubiales affirmed his intent to defend himself and present evidence that supports his account. He sent a message to supporters in the country and beyond, including women who might have felt harmed, stating that the issue is not about gender but about factual accuracy and justice for everyone.
In his view, a fair trial is essential and should be the standard for all involved, regardless of gender. He argued that equality means equal rights and equal accountability. He expressed concern over how some media and political voices have treated him, insisting that such treatment should not be the norm for anyone in the future.
The overarching theme of his statement centered on a commitment to truth, a refusal to concede to premature judgments, and a call for a balanced, independent resolution. He asked for patience as authorities continue to evaluate the facts and urged the public to allow due process to unfold without bias, while reaffirming support for those who feel they were affected by the events in question.