Angel Torres, the Getafe club president, stood at a public presentation of the Madrid club’s communication strategy for the new season and used the moment to address a broader storm surrounding Spanish football leadership. In that setting, he commented on the Jenni Hermoso kiss incident and the reactions that followed, arguing that the federation’s leadership must face up to the consequences of its recent actions. The remarks painted a picture of a federation at a crossroads, with calls for accountability echoing through the room. Torres spoke with a clear emphasis on the need for transparency, responsibility, and decisive leadership from the top echelons of the sport in Spain, signaling that Getafe expects a change in how the federation operates moving forward and a more disciplined approach to public statements and policy from its president.”
Torres demanded his immediate resignation
In a forceful, no-nonsense tone, Torres argued that the federation president should step down without delay. He stated that Rubiales’s conduct had been deeply disappointing and that his tenure could not responsibly continue even for another minute. The Getafe leader proposed a direct course of action: if the current president could not continue in his role, then intervention by the national government should be considered to impose sanctions and sustain the disqualification process until a clear resolution is reached. He characterized the public apologies issued by Rubiales as insufficient and asked for further clarification and concrete steps that demonstrate real accountability. The emphasis was on a leadership transition as a prerequisite for restoring confidence and unity within Spanish football.
The head of Getafe also recalled the broader implications of Rubiales’s role, noting the legal and ethical responsibilities tied to the federation’s public image. He argued that the federation cannot tolerate ongoing conduct that undermines the sport’s reputation, highlighting the possibility that the organization risks losing international opportunities and credibility if the leadership remains under scrutiny. The discussion underlined a belief that decisive, principled action was essential for the federation to regain trust from clubs, players, and fans alike, and that a leadership renewal could pave the way for a more accountable and transparent governance framework.
Against the Rubiales meeting
Towards the end of the talk, attention turned to Rubiales’s decision to convene an extraordinary congress as a shield against potential disqualification from the Supreme Sports Council. The congress was framed as a protective measure by Rubiales, who insisted that his position remained valid and that it would be reaffirmed by voting members. He contended that his status in the Assembly was secure, even as other officials had departed from the scene. The tone suggested a strategic move: to consolidate support within the federation and signal resilience in the face of legal and procedural scrutiny. The discussion implied that the extraordinary congress would become a focal point for how the federation navigates imminent threats to its leadership and how it balances internal loyalties with external accountability.