During the Gagarin Cup playoffs, the second round produced a string of standout performances that defined the bracket and set the tone for the semifinals. In the crease, Vladislav Poyapolsky of Dinamo emerged as the round’s premier goalie, delivering a save rate of 94.16 percent across the six games in the series. That level of efficiency, combined with calm positioning and quick reads, helped his team secure a 4-2 series victory. Poyapolsky’s work ethic and timely saves steadied his club during critical stretches, turning pressure into momentum and giving Dinamo a reliable foundation as they navigated a tough matchup. The impact of his play extended beyond the box score, influencing how opponents approached each shift and how Dinamo managed the tempo of the games. In a round where goaltending quality often dictated outcomes, his performance stood out as a defining element of the round.
Alexei Vasilevsky of Salavat Yulaev earned recognition as the round’s top defender. His two-way game shone as he supported transitions, clogged lanes, and closed in on attacking players with deliberate, effective body position. Vasilevsky’s ability to combine steady defense with smart pinches and timely clears helped Salavat Yulaev maintain balance when the pace quickened and the pressure intensified. His steady presence in the back end allowed his teammates’ forwards to press higher up the ice, knowing the blue line would hold the line when necessary. The defender’s performance in the round underscored how a strong, intelligent defensive game can elevate a team’s overall playoff readiness and keep games within reach during late-score situations.
The showdown between Dynamo Moscow and Spartak Moscow was a testament to depth, resilience, and late-closing ability. After a grueling seven-game sequence, Dynamo Moscow emerged with a 4-3 triumph in the decisive game, a result that reflected the series’ tightly contested nature and the discipline both sides displayed. Each contest featured momentum swings, power-play opportunities, and a series of sharp finishes that kept spectators on the edge of their seats. The drama underscored the capital club’s capacity to execute under pressure and to find scoring solutions in pivotal moments, reinforcing their standing as a formidable force in the bracket as the semifinals approached.
Alexander Radulov of Lokomotiv Yaroslavl was the round’s leading scorer, contributing six points in the clash with Avangard Omsk. He amassed three goals and three assists across the four wins that declared the series, giving Lokomotiv a strong offensive engine as they navigated a tight four-to-three result. Radulov’s blend of speed, vision, and finish transformed several offensive sequences into goals and helped Lokomotiv sustain pressure when the series teetered on the edge. His presence provided durability in the lineup and created opportunities for teammates to exploit gaps in Avangard’s structure, a key factor in pushing the series to its late stages.
The round’s early success also featured a standout goaltending performance from Semyon Vyazov of Salavat Yulaev. He stopped 92.65 percent of shots across four games while guiding his team to a 3-1 record in those appearances. Vyazov’s efficiency between the pipes gave Salavat Yulaev the confidence to play aggressively in the attacking zone, knowing they could rely on timely saves when the opposition broke through the first line of defense. His work not only stabilized the series for his team but also reinforced the importance of goaltending depth in a long playoff run, where every save can swing the tempo toward a favorable outcome.
In the semifinals, Lokomotiv advanced to meet Salavat Yulaev and Dynamo Moscow as the bracket moved closer to the final. Magnitogorsk Metallurg, the defending KHL champion, continued to showcase the level of finish expected from a cup-contending squad. The final stage of the playoffs culminated in a strong statement from Metallurg, who captured the Gagarin Cup by sweeping Lokomotiv four games to none. The series highlighted Metallurg’s balanced game, featuring tight defensive structure, efficient goaltending, and a steady, multi-line attack that overwhelmed the opposition. It was a stark reminder of how a team with cohesion and depth can close out a championship series in a clean, decisive fashion.
Earlier rounds also featured memorable matchups between Lokomotiv and Avangard, among others, setting the tone for the postseason and shaping the expectations for the later rounds. Those early confrontations created a buzz among fans and analysts alike, underscoring the league’s ongoing tradition of fast-paced, hard-hitting hockey and the significance of every possession as teams chased the Gagarin Cup. As the bracket evolved, teams leaned on a mix of experience, depth, and the ability to execute when it mattered most, crafting a postseason narrative that fans would remember for years to come.