FIS Leaders Comment on Russian Participation in International Skiing
Johan Eliash, the President of the International Ski Federation, addressed the ongoing debate over whether Russian athletes should be allowed to compete in global ski events. The discussion is rooted in a broader conversation about politics in sport, a topic that remains delicate for many nations and organizations involved in winter sport.
According to Eliash, the Olympic Movement’s core values emphasize that sport should not become a tool for political confrontation. He stressed that the platform of international competition exists for the athletes and for the unity of sport across the world. In challenging times, athletes cannot control their place of origin, yet what is happening in the sport world today raises serious questions about fairness and global solidarity. The executive noted that the current situation is highly controversial and demands careful handling from every angle. He asserted that sport is a fundamental human right and that the rights of athletes must be defended and respected, even as policies and sanctions are debated [NRK].
Historically, the International Ski Federation has taken a firm stance by excluding athletes from Russia and Belarus from international events. Those sanctions were in place through the end of the 2021/22 season, with extensions following. The consequence was that many athletes missed critical stages of the World Cup, a setback for those aiming to compete at the highest level during that period.
Heading into this season, the World Cup contour has been shaped by standout performances from Nordic nations. Norwegian star Johannes Klæbo has established a lead in the overall standings, building on a strong showing from the previous season. On the men’s side, Klæbo’s success has been contrasted by the results of Russian athletes who previously topped the standings, such as Alexander Bolshunov, highlighting a shift in the competitive balance on the circuit. In women’s competition, Norwegian competitor Tiril Vengen has drawn attention with consistent performances and podium finishes that underscore the depth of Norway’s sprint and endurance programs [NRK].
Voices from the skiing community have reflected diverse opinions about sanctions and eligibility. Some former athletes and analysts argue that the presence or absence of any country in international events carries implications beyond sport, influencing perceptions of fairness, national identity, and the integrity of competition. For example, a former skier from Russia noted that public sentiment in some Scandinavian nations toward sanctions can be mixed, with supporters and critics each voicing plausible arguments about the future of the sport and its institutions. In this evolving landscape, stakeholders emphasize the need to balance competitive integrity with universal human rights and the spirit of fair play that underpins all Olympic and international sport [NRK].
As the season progresses, the dialogue surrounding eligibility criteria, disciplinary measures, and the role of international bodies remains ongoing. The overarching aim remains clear: preserve the safety, competitiveness, and unity of the sport while navigating geopolitical realities that affect athletes around the world. The skiing community continues to monitor developments closely, recognizing that decisions made today will influence the sport’s direction for years to come. The conversations, though complex, are framed by a commitment to ensuring that athletes have the opportunity to compete on merit while respecting the broader values that guide international sport [NRK].