Former Dynamo forward Oleg Terekhin urged the team players to look beyond the coach and focus on the results the blue-whites are delivering this season. He emphasized that accountability starts with those on the pitch and in the locker room, not exclusively with the coaching staff. Terekhin argued that the players should evaluate the club’s performance from their own perspective, noting that a change in leadership often shifts the discourse but does not automatically fix the underlying issues on the field.
“Jokanovic’s resignation? I’m sorry, but first let’s ask the players about their stance on this. For example, from the stars gathered in Chelsea. Well, another coach will come – will they change, will they run better, will they run more?”
In this line of thought, Terekhin called for a candid self-assessment from the Dynamo squad. He challenged the team to explain the on-field dynamics that have led to inconsistent results, suggesting that the players bear a portion of responsibility for the current situation. He asserted that the tendency to look outward for reasons or scapegoats—whether at staff or management level—needs to be replaced with a clear-eyed review of performances during training, preparation, and match days. The veteran urged athletes to consider how their own preparation, discipline, and decision-making influence the outcomes that fans and analysts watch with every game.
Same Zakharyan, let Fomin explain. Can you explain why you play like that? Let’s start with ourselves. Why do we always ask coaches? First of all, I think the players are guilty. They still have to get their salaries somehow,” Terekhin says. “Match TV”.
Following the league clash, Dynamo faced Akhmat Grozny and suffered a 0:3 defeat on May 14. The result reinforced the urgency for club leadership to assess both strategic direction and squad cohesion. Reports from the corridors of the club indicated a swift decision-making process was underway, culminating in the announcement that Slavisha Jokanovic would be relieved of duties as head coach. The timing of the dismissal—occurring shortly after the loss—reflected the club’s readiness to reframe its approach this season and to address mounting pressure from supporters and stakeholders alike.
Slavisa Jokanovic had been appointed to Dynamo ahead of the season, stepping into a role that carries high expectations in a club with a storied history and a demanding fan base. Under his stewardship, the team faced a difficult trajectory that included an exit from the Russian Cup and a 2-0 defeat at home to Fakel on the centennial celebration day. The combination of domestic cup exit and league struggles underscored the challenges of aligning tactical plans with the squad’s capabilities and the heightened scrutiny that accompanies Dynamo’s ambitions. The season’s early struggles prompted conversations about squad depth, adaptability, and the need for a clear, consistent identity on the pitch.
After the 27th week of the Russian Premier League, Dynamo stood in seventh place in the standings, a position that reflected both the potential within the squad and the gaps that still needed attention. The club’s performance trajectory prompted discussions among analysts and fans about whether roster changes, leadership continuity, or a revised game plan would better position Dynamo to compete for the upper echelons of the table in the latter half of the campaign. The broader narrative centered on the balance between developmental goals for younger players and the immediate results demanded by a club of Dynamo’s stature.
Former agent Dmitry Selyuk weighed in on the personnel decision-making, stating that Dynamo made a misstep by signing Fedor Smolov. His critique highlighted the high-risk, high-reward nature of transfer strategies in a league where every new addition must adapt quickly to the club’s style and temperament. Selyuk’s perspective added another layer to the public discussion, illustrating how the interplay between player acquisition, salary structures, and performance expectations can shape a season’s course. The dialogue surrounding Smolov’s fit with Dynamo’s plans became a focal point for fans who were keen to understand how the club intends to optimize its attacking options and overall balance in the squad.