“Such a triumphant victory for Dvorkovich was not expected”
The FIDE presidential election yielded results that many in the Russian Chess Federation viewed as favorable. The question on everyone’s mind was how predictable the outcome would be for the federation’s stakeholders across North America and beyond.
– The federation anticipated Arkady Dvorkovich’s victory, yet the margin was astonishing – 157:16. Such a clear win surprised readers and participants alike. It confirmed the confidence of many in his leadership, even if the magnitude exceeded initial expectations.
– Will Dvorkovich reach similar levels of success in a second term as he did in the first within FIDE?
– Assessment of the second term will follow the results achieved. Looking at the first period, it is evident that he demonstrated effectiveness, as reflected by support from more than 150 countries in the elections. A second notable achievement was the introduction of new technologies to chess and the organization of the online Olympics during the covid period, when travel and in-person events were restricted. The Online Olympiad stood out as a successful example of Dvorkovich’s leadership, and many federations are watching to see if others follow suit.
– How is the Russian Chess Federation currently operating, and what are the main tasks ahead?
– The federation is navigating restrictions and focusing on returning athletes to international competition. This is a multi-stage effort guided by a concrete action plan. First, there is a push to ensure the inclusion of disabled players, a group that faced the most obstacles, so they can participate in the Chess Olympiad and World Championships. Second, the return of veterans is on the agenda, as senior tournaments remain central to many players’ lives, and denying them opportunities would be inhumane. Third, the plan calls for children and youth competitions to resume, followed by the return of the national team. Governing bodies have taken shape: on August 7, FIDE vice presidents were elected and a broad reorganization began. The process will extend through October, and as restrictions ease, discussions will move to enabling international events on Russian soil.
— How does international isolation affect chess development in Russia?
– Isolation poses challenges. Growth hinges on competing with the strongest players worldwide. The current reality shows different patterns; for instance, players from some nations remain within their borders due to ongoing disruptions. The outlook remains hopeful that progress will resume as the global chess community recalibrates.
– Will new tournaments be organized to keep Russian players competitive?
– Tournaments featuring participants from China and other nations are a regular feature, providing international training for Russian players. There are also ideas for commemorations, such as a tournament honoring the long-serving grandmaster Averbakh, who has left a lasting mark on the game. The debate is ongoing but active, reflecting a desire to blend tradition with new opportunities.
“The salary of a chess coach is comparable to that of a math teacher”
– The rising popularity of chess has sparked questions about its role and visibility. What factors drive the current interest in the sport?
– The path forward in Russia’s chess administration includes raising public awareness and setting measurable indicators. One key measure is coaching salaries, which if aligned with or above those of math or language teachers, signals broader recognition of chess as a professional field. Another metric is medal success across age groups and formats, from children’s events to national team competitions and specialized tournaments for athletes with disabilities. This dual focus supports a healthy ecosystem for the sport’s growth.
– Progress is steady, and the ambition remains high. The federation is poised to address individuals on a personal level. A notable recent milestone involved Vladimir Kramnik, whose triumphs resonated with fans of all ages. In April of the coming year, Ian Nepomniachtchi is expected to challenge for the world title again. There is also hope that a female player from Russia will qualify for a world championship match and that two World Championship matches featuring Russian athletes will take place in 2023.
– Russia’s young talents include Andrei Esipenko and Volodar Murzin, among others. While there is a promising cadre, the national team will face questions about depth and breadth in the near term. A longer view shows that a child entering the game at age five needs two decades to mature into a top competitor. The current generation reflects the post-Soviet era, when chess did not enjoy broad participation. The next ten years will be pivotal for sustaining competitiveness, yet the federation remains optimistic about continued success and the return of trophies to the country’s galleries of achievements.
– How is Jan preparing for a second world championship match?
– Communication with the contender continues as he recovers from the demanding Candidates’ Tournament in Madrid. The performance there was historic, signaling a path that would etch itself into chess history should the player secure the crown. The journey through such events is strenuous, and the broader community recognizes the magnitude of competing at that level.
“Leave the crown if you don’t have the strength.”
– Could Russia produce another magnus like Carlsen, a figure who held the crown for a decade?
– It is difficult to predict. Carlsen’s rise began in a country where chess was once not widely popular. The future champions may emerge from similarly unlikely places, reinforcing the sport’s universal appeal.
– Are you surprised by Carlsen’s decision to decline the second match against Nepomniachtchi?
– Not at all. It was anticipated. His choice reflects a strong personal character and the enormous energy such matches require. Carlsen remains a formidable figure, and the decision to pause a title match underscores the intense demands of top-level chess. It is a reminder that even the best can hit a wall, and staying sharp is a perpetual challenge.
– After Carlsen’s withdrawal, how is the method for determining the world champion evolving?
A world champion is still defined by winning the championship match. History remembers the decisive moments that decide the title, not just rating points or early triumphs. If energy and form do not align for a title bid, the crown may pass to another hero, just as many great players have done in the past.
— Is there a need to reform the World Championship format? Does a multi-game match with one challenger feel dull?
– The current format remains the preferred approach, offering a unique and storied path to the crown. The champions may shine in other formats as well, but the crown match should honor its traditional structure and significance.
– Is Russia positioned to host the World Championship match between Ian Nepomniachtchi and Ding Liren?
— The Chess Olympiad’s relocation abroad prompted strong discussions about hosting duties. With restrictions easing, the federation hopes to see the World Championship staged in Moscow or perhaps in St. Petersburg. Reinstating national symbols like the flag and anthem at international events remains a priority, underscoring a return to normalcy for Russian chess on the world stage.