The Ministry of Internal Affairs has placed Akhmad Akhmedov, once a leading coach for Dagestan’s kickboxing program, on its wanted list. The notice appeared in Russia’s official police database, signaling that authorities consider him a person of interest in a pending case. The public record identifies him as Akhmedov Ahmed Magomedovich and notes that he is wanted under a provision of the Russian Criminal Code. The statement from the agency did not specify the exact article involved, leaving the exact legal basis unclear in public summaries.
Earlier reports indicated that a criminal case had been opened against Akhmedov on charges related to treason. The implications of that designation point to involvement in activities that are treated with high severity by Russian prosecutors, and the case has captured attention because of Akhmedov’s recent movements and roles abroad.
Akhmedov has resided in Ukraine since 2017. During his time there, he held a leadership role as president of the K-1 professional kickboxing federation, a position that reflected his sustained influence within the sport beyond Russia. When regional hostilities escalated and the Ukrainian defense structures mobilized, Akhmedov joined the Armed Forces of Ukraine. He served with units raised to bolster territorial defense and was later assigned to volunteer formations linked with Dagestan’s fighters abroad. In that capacity, he participated in operations to defend key frontline positions and engaged in combat assignments in the area around Bakhmut, a city that has carried strategic importance in recent conflicts.
Despite his continued residence outside Russia, Akhmedov has not relinquished his Russian citizenship. He still maintains family ties within Russia, a fact that has been noted in several public summaries of the case. The dual connection to both nations has added complexity to the legal and political discussions surrounding his status and the charges that have been leveled against him.
Observers emphasize the broader context, noting that treason-related prosecutions attract significant international and domestic attention due to their legal gravity and the sensitive nature of the accused’s activities across borders. The ongoing situation highlights how individuals with high-profile athletic careers can become entwined in geopolitical and security narratives, especially when their actions intersect with armed conflict and national loyalties. The case underscores the complexity that can arise when public figures hold prominent roles in sports while engaging in activities that are scrutinized by multiple legal and national security frameworks.
As events continue to unfold, official statements from authorities remain cautious about disclosing details of specific charges. The evolving story reflects the tension between public interest and the legal process, as investigators pursue the case with procedural rigor while media outlets and observers seek clearer explanations of the legal grounds and potential outcomes. While Akhmedov’s current whereabouts and activities drew attention, the case also serves as a broader reminder of the legal responsibilities that accompany international movement, national service, and leadership within professional sports organizations.
Reports about Akhmedov’s status as a person of interest in a treason inquiry have kept him in the public eye, prompting questions about accountability, loyalty, and how athletes transition into roles that extend beyond competition. For now, the record shows a formal designation of pursuit by the authorities, with the exact charges remaining unspecified in certain public summaries. The evolving narrative continues to be shaped by updates from law enforcement agencies and the legal processes that will determine the final disposition of the matter.