Anna Maria Żukowska speaks with a quiet sadness about Paulina Matysiak, who, together with Marcin Horała from Law and Justice, helped launch a social movement aimed at advancing Poland’s development on Tok FM. The Left Club’s chair also weighs in on the future of the Razem MP’s path and what it might mean for Polish politics.
She emphasizes that she is not placing demands on anyone and is simply awaiting a decision from Paulina Matysiak’s own party, Razem. The stance reflects a careful, measured approach to shifting alliances and the evolving landscape within the Polish left.
Żukowska notes that what happened was personally disheartening, though she frames it kindly. She mentions that she recorded a video on the same day she held a press conference with Matysiak about the Central Communication Port project, underscoring how closely these events are tied to broader policy debates.
She makes clear that her disagreements are not with Matysiak over the CPK itself, but with the move to present a political movement as if it were a social one. In Żukowska’s view, social movements generally emerge from grassroots momentum, not from parliamentary actors declaring them from above. She argues that the current arrangement leans toward a political effort, possibly aimed at the next presidential election, a trajectory she does not endorse.
Asked about whether Marcin Horała and Paulina Matysiak intend to run for president, Żukowska offers a cautious, speculative take: she suggests the plan might unfold in a certain direction, though she refrains from providing a definitive prediction.
Together or not?
Żukowska also addresses the friction and differences between the Left and Together. Despite persistent disagreements on some issues, she insists on continuing the joint course between the New Left and Razem. This week, she says, they are outlining the core principles that should guide the functioning of the party, signaling a formal consolidation of their shared agenda.
As discussions evolve, she emphasizes the need for clear communication within the coalition to avoid what she calls friendly fire. The aim is to establish channels and practices that support constructive dialogue rather than internal conflict, ensuring the coalition can present a united front on key policy matters.
In reflecting on the current moment, Matysiak herself expresses confidence that the approach could push Polish politics forward. The dialogue between these figures highlights a broader debate about how new political movements emerge, how they relate to established parties, and how they position themselves in an increasingly crowded political field in Poland.
Overall, the exchange underscores the fragile balance between pursuing policy-driven collaboration and managing political ambitions within a changing left landscape. The conversations in media forums and within party meetings point to a period of recalibration, where leaders weigh their strategic options, the appetite of their supporters, and the potential for lasting impact on Poland’s political trajectory.
Additional reflections on these developments continue to unfold as stakeholders weigh how best to translate social aims into sustainable political action that can address Poland’s growth, governance, and regional priorities.