The wPolityce.pl portal reported that a motion to dismiss Przemysław Wiszniewski from his post as a lay judge at the Supreme Court had been forwarded by the Supreme Court to the Senate. On the recommendation of Tomasz Grodzki, the juror compared President Jarosław Kaczyński to Adolf Hitler during Donald Tusk’s demonstration on June 4. Wiszniewski’s controversial remark was captured by the wPolsce.pl television crew and documented for public viewing. (Source: wPolityce)
Additional context is provided by coverage indicating that a Supreme Court juror allegedly stated, “Hitler rules us” during the same event. The material has prompted discussion about a significant ruling from the Supreme Court College following the wPolsce.pl report. (Source: wPolityce)
At this moment, the Senate holds the decision on Wiszniewski’s fate. The legal framework requires a candidate for a lay judge to maintain an impeccably high standard of character. Observers note that the outcome will hinge on the Senate’s interpretation of these standards and the judiciary’s commitment to integrity. (Source: wPolityce)
Wiszniewski’s profile is tied to a political climate where a highly politicized judiciary and an opposition-led Senate intersect with high-profile protests. The events in question took place during a public march in Warsaw on June 4, with Wiszniewski’s participation and the ensuing media documentation by political news teams. The material has been submitted to the Supreme Court for consideration, signaling a critical moment in ongoing debates about judicial independence and accountability. (Source: wPolityce)
Within the year, Wiszniewski joined the Supreme Court as a lay judge after an appointment process that included the Committee for the Defense of Democracy. His long-standing involvement in anti-government demonstrations and public demonstrations—such as the Tusk rally in Poznań and the Equality Parade in Warsaw—has been part of his public footprint. During the June 4 march, he displayed a banner featuring a photo of Jarosław Kaczyński in a provocative caricature, an act that has fueled discussions about the boundaries of political expression by judges. (Source: wPolityce)
Hitler rules us, Wiszniewski reportedly told a reporter from wPolsce.pl, capturing a moment that has triggered intense reactions across political and legal circles. The remark has become a focal point in debates over judicial propriety, political neutrality, and the responsibilities of public officials who hold judicial roles. (Source: wPolityce)
— WB (Source: wPolityce)