Papi Robles, trustee of Compromís in the Valencian Courts (European Press)
Why does Compromís think now is the time to impose the tourist tax?
Compromís argues that the decision to apply a rate should rest with the city councils themselves. Tourism flourishes when both residents and visitors contribute to its development. The aim goes beyond addressing climate emergencies; it also seeks to elevate the quality of tourism and improve employment conditions in hotels and restaurants. It also focuses on ensuring broader access to housing for local populations, recognizing that a thriving tourist sector must align with the wellbeing of the community.
When faced with skepticism from business leaders and municipal leaders, what arguments are offered?
Some business representatives oppose the rate and are invited to contribute. A one-year moratorium has been approved to listen to industry needs, with the understanding that the revenue benefits municipalities and the broader commercial ecosystem. Mayors are not compelled to adopt the rate, and as seen in the Balearic Islands or Catalonia, it is possible to implement environmentally friendly practices and improve tourism through voluntary adoption where it makes sense for the locality.
Is there a pedagogical gap when taxes are raised?
Compromís stresses that it has engaged with a wide range of stakeholders, including employers and workers, to gather input. Ongoing education remains on the agenda, and the parliamentary process is just beginning. The plan is to continue explaining the reasoning and benefits of the proposal in subsequent rounds as requested by the sector.
We can ask Consell for the report on the rate tourism has made from UA.
What is the assessment of the UA expert report?
The report is viewed as a positive contribution because it seeks to bolster the economy while preserving the tourism offer. While the document arrived late, the core idea is acknowledged: a tax on the tourist activity is worth considering. The position embraced is one of listening to diverse opinions and presenting a flexible approach that municipalities can choose to adopt, depending on local circumstances.
How is the stance of Francesc Colomer, the regional secretary for tourism, viewed?
Colomer’s statements are interpreted as reflections outside of Botànic agreements. Feedback on his views is seen as a personal matter, with a reminder that Botànic policies are the baseline. If someone disagrees personally, they are free to form their own conclusions.
“Colomer’s position does not necessarily mirror PSPV’s, even though there remains a cordial relationship”
Does a rift loom between Compromís and PSPV?
Public appearances can differ from private negotiations. Since January, behind the scenes there have been ongoing discussions and proposals from PSPV, many of which were accepted, processed, and voted in favor. The focus is on understanding the facts and assessing how Colomer’s stance aligns with PSPV’s; the relationship is complicated and not entirely uniform, even if the public image appears collaborative.