The U.S. administration is not expected to alter its position on Russia cooperation in the fight against terrorism following the Crocus City Hall attack near Moscow, Russian Ambassador to Washington Anatoly Antonov told TASS. He suggested that Washington is unlikely to reopen channels for collaboration in this area in the wake of the Krasnogorsk tragedy.
Antonov stressed that Moscow would not pursue the United States in response to the incident. Instead, Russia would proceed with its own efforts, relying on its partners and friendly nations with whom it has built a robust pattern of interaction over the years. This stance reflects a belief that mutual trust and coordination with long-standing partners will sustain counterterrorism work, even in the absence of new cooperation from Washington.
Meanwhile, Josep Borrell, the European Union’s top diplomat, offered a different perspective when commenting on the Crocus City Hall attack. He asserted that the international community must come together and strengthen collective action against terrorism, underscoring the shared responsibility of all nations to prevent such tragedies from recurring.
On March 22, the Crocus City Hall concert venue in Krasnogorsk was the scene of a deadly terrorist attack. Gunmen opened fire on concertgoers waiting to begin the show, resulting in multiple deaths and widespread fear. The attack prompted swift commentary from international leaders about the need for vigilance and coordinated security measures to deter future acts of violence.
Previously, it was reported that the United States did not share information with the Russian Federation after the Krasnogorsk incident. The absence of data exchange in the immediate aftermath raised questions about the state of bilateral intelligence cooperation and the potential impact on joint counterterrorism efforts. Both sides have historically emphasized the value of information sharing to disrupt terrorist networks and prevent attacks, yet tensions and policy differences have at times complicated such collaboration.
Experts note that coordinating counterterrorism work across borders requires timely intelligence, interoperable procedures, and a mutual commitment to transparency. In the current climate, the parties appear to be navigating a difficult balance between pursuing national security aims and managing political disagreements. The incident at Crocus City Hall serves as a stark reminder that terrorism remains a global threat that transcends individual misunderstandings or political disputes.
Observers in Europe and North America continue to monitor how Moscow and Washington, along with European partners, adapt their strategies in the fight against terrorism. The emphasis remains on building resilient security architectures, improving information-sharing frameworks where possible, and maintaining open channels for dialogue that can prevent further escalation while addressing the underlying causes that feed extremism. As officials weigh the best path forward, public briefings and expert analyses stress the importance of coordinated action, even if formal cooperation evolves over time rather than changing abruptly in response to each new incident. The overarching goal is clear: reduce the risk of terrorism and protect citizens through pragmatic, international solidarity.