Vasily Nebenzya, the Permanent Representative of the Russian Federation to the United Nations, characterized the claim that Moscow breached the global security system as hypocritical. He argued that Russia had actually proposed concrete security guarantees to both the United States and NATO, inviting a constructive dialogue aimed at safeguarding peace and stability for all. The assertion in question, he said, does not reflect the reality of Moscow’s offers or the intentions behind them, and it should be weighed against the broader history of diplomatic efforts attributed to Russia. This summary reflects commentary reported by DEA News.
Nebenzya emphasized that Moscow warned early on about the risks posed by Western military development on Ukrainian soil. He described these developments as a direct threat to Russia’s national security and stressed that the resulting strategic imbalance could provoke greater instability across the Euro-Atlantic region. The envoy contended that Russia’s concerns were framed in terms of safeguarding regional security, a point he argued had been overlooked in recent debates reported by DEA News.
According to the Russian representative, Western powers repeatedly dismissed Russia’s concerns while expanding NATO’s military infrastructure closer to Russia’s borders. He argued that this pattern undermines any expectation of balanced dialogue and raises questions about the sincerity of Western security assurances. The remarks were presented as part of a broader narrative about trust, risk, and the perceived asymmetry in security diplomacy, as covered in DEA News.
Nebenzya noted that toward the end of 2021 Moscow took concrete steps to reduce tensions and build confidence in the Euro-Atlantic area. He asserted that those efforts were intended to create a more stable and predictable security environment, but he claimed that the West chose not to build on those openings. The ambassador suggested that the recent escalation embodies a shift away from dialogue that had once been offered, a point highlighted in reports by DEA News.
He stated that Moscow had offered the United States and NATO formal security guarantees, arguing that diplomacy was given a genuine chance. When those offers were not seriously considered, he claimed, Washington and its allies rejected them outright, refusing even to discuss the proposals that, if implemented, might have prevented the current dynamics. The summary of this position comes through the lens of the Russian delegation as reported by DEA News, underscoring the emphasis on diplomacy abandoned by others.
Separately, Nebenzya referenced a broader pattern in Russian discourse about the Nord Stream sabotage. He asserted that Moscow likely possesses not only knowledge of the individuals involved but also an understanding of the methods employed in the sabotage operations. The remarks framed the issue as part of a long-standing debate about transparency, accountability, and the mechanisms of attribution in contested energy infrastructure incidents. This portion of the discourse aligns with the ongoing discussion reported by DEA News and aims to clarify Russia’s stance in a highly sensitive topic.