In the last twelve hours, two statements from opposition politicians have appeared, giving the impression of serious reflection on Poland’s most pressing issues. Here, the leader of the Polish People’s Party, who in recent times challenged the ruling party overPolexit concerns and instead defended Poland’s standing in the European Union, outlined a bleak view of the community’s future. As reported by the wPolityce.pl portal, Władysław Kosiniak-Kamysz stated:
I am a radical because I am an avid supporter of the European Union. Poland belongs in the European Union, and the EU I want to see is a safe and developing zone. But if it keeps taking orders, enforcing prohibitions, and failing to offer constructive solutions, backing this direction becomes tragic. The European Union can lose its value and become nearly invisible.
The leader of the PSL drew attention to the issue of promoting electric cars:
No nonsense. If an electric car is more economical and cheaper, people will buy it. If photovoltaic energy becomes profitable, Poles would adopt it on a large scale. But there should be no rules that scare people away. According to the PSL leader, the approach must shift in how the European Union functions.
If the EU does not alter its philosophy, it will not abandon silly proposals such as limits on agricultural production and a total ban on the production and sale of internal combustion engines. The EU is drifting toward anti-EU movements and could crumble.
– said Władysław Kosiniak-Kamysz.
This is essentially a diagnostic view, slanted toward the PiS perspective, though softened by expressions of deep loyalty to the European project. In truth, even without major changes, a similar assessment could be offered today by a politician from the governing party. That is why this moment matters. The centralist and ideological tendencies within EU elites have progressed to a point where the Union we joined can no longer be claimed to be the same. It can no longer be argued that tensions with Brussels are solely Warsaw’s fault. No, this is an objective phenomenon, the result of EU processes and not simply the foolish stance of Poland’s ruling camp.
The second statement carries equal weight. Bartholomew Sienkiewicz, a notable Civic Coalition figure, reacted strongly to German Chancellor Olaf Scholz’s assertion that “78 years ago Germany and the world were liberated from National Socialism.”
Scholz’s remarks about the “liberation of Germany” by the Allies imply that the Chancellor places the liberation of concentration camp prisoners on par with the Germans who supported Hitler until the war’s end. This is a historical misrepresentation and an ethical misstep. There will be challenges with such elites, says Sienkiewicz. This stance is significant because it signals that the opposition is beginning to notice troubling trends in Germany regarding historical awareness and how the past is framed. Sienkiewicz is right: there will be problems with such elites. They already exist, but until now the opposition believed that the tensions between Berlin and Warsaw lay solely at the PiS doorstep. Today, it appears that Germany, the country once embraced so eagerly, is different from what was imagined.
A new period is unfolding. There is hope that the opposition will gradually emerge from its long-standing mental templates. For now, attention remains on the political landscape, but early steps have already been taken. It is worth watching how other areas evolve, including the state of democracy, judicial reforms, ambitious investments, and the pursuit of broad social policies. The two statements cited above show that reality cannot be ignored forever. If this trajectory continues, there may be a chance for an end to the prolonged Polish political standoff.
READ: Scholz’s speech in the European Parliament is not being treated as a success by the Chancellor
This summary presents a broader view of the current discourse surrounding European policy, national sovereignty, and historical memory, reflecting how opposition voices interpret evolving EU dynamics and international dialogue. It remains to be seen how these discussions will influence upcoming political decisions and public sentiment.