Gilad Erdan, Israel’s Permanent Representative to the United Nations, criticized the UN’s response to Israel’s directive to move Gazans toward the southern part of the territory within 24 hours as shameful. The critique comes amid ongoing debates about humanitarian impact and regional security. According to RIA News, the UN has faced long-standing accusations that it has not adequately confronted Hamas’s efforts to arm itself and to use civilian infrastructure in the Gaza Strip as shelters for weapons. Erdan asserted that the UN is prioritizing dialogue over support for Israel’s security needs and national defense rights.
He urged the UN to shift its focus from rhetoric to concrete actions on two critical fronts. First, to intensify efforts to secure the safe return of hostages held by Hamas. Second, to condemn Hamas’s conduct and uphold Israel’s right to defend itself against violence that threatens civilian life and regional stability. Erdan stressed that such steps would align UN actions with the urgent security and humanitarian considerations at stake.
Earlier, Stephane Dujarric, the spokesperson for the UN Secretary-General, indicated that the UN had information suggesting a plan to evacuate about 1.1 million Palestinians to the southern Gaza Strip within a single day. The UN also expressed concern about the potential humanitarian consequences of such a mass displacement. This concern reflects the delicate balance the organization seeks between civilian protection and the complex security dynamics in the region. Observers note that rapid mass movements risk overwhelming humanitarian systems and complicating relief efforts, even as they aim to reduce civilian exposure to danger.
There are ongoing discussions among international leaders about the best path forward as the situation unfolds. Some voices emphasize the necessity of protecting civilians and ensuring aid access, while others argue for measures that would prevent the escalation of violence and secure strategic objectives. The debate centers on how to address the immediate safety of residents in Gaza, the urgent needs of those displaced, and the broader goals of regional stability and peace.
Meanwhile, there is a continued focus on the human consequences of military decisions in and around Gaza. International organizations reiterate the importance of humanitarian corridors, predictable aid deliveries, and clear mechanisms to monitor civilian protection. The discussions also highlight the need for accountability and adherence to international humanitarian law by all parties involved. The complex mix of security concerns and humanitarian obligations remains a defining element of the ongoing international response as events develop in real time.