In recent remarks, Zabihullah Mujahid, a spokesperson for the Taliban movement, claimed that American unmanned aerial vehicles allegedly breached Afghan airspace. The statement was reported by RIA News, which quoted Mujahid as asserting that these aircraft clearly belong to the United States. He also noted that drones were observed flying over the territories of neighboring countries. Mujahid urged all involved parties to acknowledge their responsibilities in the matter and to put an end to what he described as aggression.
The Taliban spokesperson stressed that neighboring states should not permit American drones to violate Afghan airspace by using their own airspace as a staging ground. He framed the issue as a regional security concern, calling for accountability and restraint from all sides to prevent further escalations.
In his statements, Mujahid referenced recent claims circulating in international discourse about U.S. involvement in operations connected to the extremist group known as the Islamic State. He suggested that such comments should be examined carefully and viewed through the lens of ongoing regional tensions within and around Afghanistan.
The report by RIA News, which covered Mujahid’s remarks, appeared amid a broader pattern of assertions from various actors about drone activity in Central and South Asia. Observers note that the topic touches on questions of sovereignty, surveillance, and the evolving role of unmanned systems in modern conflict. Analysts have pointed out that drone incursions, real or claimed, often generate diplomatic friction and prompt calls for clearer norms and verifiable data from all sides involved.
Across the regional landscape, authorities in Afghanistan and its neighbors have long debated issues of airspace control, border management, and cross-border security. The new allegations from the Taliban leadership contribute to an ongoing dialogue about how unmanned aircraft are employed, who authorizes their flights, and what mechanisms exist to verify and respond to such claims. Stakeholders on all sides emphasize the importance of reducing misperceptions and preventing misunderstandings that could inflame tensions in an already volatile area. The situation underlines the fragile balance between national security interests and the rights of states to monitor and protect their airspace.
Observers appreciate the need for transparent reporting and independent verification to resolve competing narratives about drone movements. The dialogue surrounding the issue reflects broader questions about international norms governing unmanned aerial operations, especially when actions by one state are alleged to infringe on another’s territorial limits. Calls for restraint, adherence to international law, and channels for dispute resolution are likely to continue as the incidents, or claims of incidents, accumulate in public discourse. Attribution for the statements remains linked to the initial report from RIA News, which has circulated as part of ongoing coverage about drone activity and regional security concerns. Still, the core point emphasized by the Taliban spokesperson remains: the perceived violation by foreign unmanned aircraft should be addressed through responsible behavior and open communication among neighboring states and major powers alike.