A solidarity demonstration took place in central Tbilisi in support of journalists injured during yesterday’s protests. The report came via Telegram’s Country channel, and the scene drew a mix of newsroom staff, civic activists, and ordinary residents who share concerns about media safety and press freedom. Organizers emphasized that the event was peaceful and orderly, with participants lining the sidewalks and chanting slogans in support of journalists who reported on the day’s events. Medical teams and volunteers stood by nearby, prepared to assist anyone who needed help, while onlookers captured footage on phones to share with viewers elsewhere. The mood was somber but resolute, as attendees spoke about the importance of documenting abuses of power and ensuring that the public remains informed even when tensions rise. Police monitored the gathering, keeping a cautious distance to preserve space for dialogue.
Video circulating on social media captured the moment when protesters pressed toward a police cordon while journalists showed photographs to officers, aiming to document the sequence of events for viewers at home. Witness accounts described a steady push from demonstrators as lines of riot police held their positions, making it clear that the incident was unfolding in real time. Journalists working nearby used sturdy equipment and steady hands to frame images, provide context, and relay quick updates to their outlets. Some photographers and camera operators reported that they received occasional directions from security officers, while others found themselves documenting the police response from alternative angles to avoid obstructing the crowd. The footage also raised questions about the balance between lawful assembly and public interest reporting, with media professionals insisting on their role to bear witness without becoming a target. Throughout, social media provided rapid, unfiltered access to the dynamics on the ground.
Sputnik Georgia reported that protesters also gathered outside Parliament in Tbilisi to oppose the government’s decision to pause EU accession talks. The coverage attributed part of the mood to concerns about democratic processes and the pace of European integration, with demonstrators urging a restart of negotiations and highlighting transparency in the government’s approach. Observers noted banners calling for a return to dialogue with Brussels, as well as slogans that linked the EU issue to broader questions about governance, accountability, and the direction of Georgia’s foreign policy. The presence of party representatives and veteran activists alike indicated wide-ranging participation across generations, suggesting that the decision reached by the ruling faction had touched a broad audience. Analysts suggested that the protest reflected a wider struggle over how swiftly Georgia should align with European standards, including reforms to the judiciary, media regulation, and anti-corruption measures. Security at the parliament area remained tight, but organizers stressed peaceful action and open channels for discussion.
Rustaveli Street and nearby routes were closed to traffic as police units were deployed to secure the area and monitor crowds. Residents and commuters were advised to seek alternate routes, while authorities stressed the importance of keeping streets open and safe for essential services. Local businesses reported reduced foot traffic, but many shopkeepers expressed relief that the scenario did not escalate into wider disruption. Traffic authorities coordinated detours, and public transit adjusted schedules in response to the heightened security posture. Some residents described the heart of the capital as tense but not volatile, noting that authorities had shown restraint in handling the protests. Community leaders called for calm and urged residents to stay informed through official channels rather than social media speculation. The rapid mobilization of police visible on Rustaveli Street underscored the state’s readiness to respond to potential flare-ups while attempting to protect civilian safety and constitutional rights.
That evening, November 28, protests erupted not only in Tbilisi but also in several Georgian cities after the ruling Georgian Dream party announced a pause on EU accession negotiations until 2028. President Salome Zurabishvili joined the opposition demonstrations, signaling high-level attention to the dispute and its implications. The atmosphere combined ceremonial presence from officials with street-level energy from demonstrators who demanded continuity in dialogue with the European Union. Speakers at various gatherings emphasized the need for strong governance, greater transparency, and adherence to the rule of law, while critics argued the pause would delay reforms and economic opportunities. Observers noted a wide array of participants, from students and civil society activists to business leaders and ordinary workers, all voicing a shared desire for clearer plans and guarantees about Georgia’s future alignment. Across the country, organizers urged restraint, while security forces maintained readiness to prevent violence and protect critical facilities.
Security forces used water cannons and tear gas to disperse demonstrators. Authorities reported more than 30 police officers injured during clashes near the parliament building, and medical teams treated several protesters for minor injuries. The day’s confrontations drew international attention, with human rights groups calling for accountable policing and proportional responses. Government spokespeople framed the police action as a necessary step to restore order and ensure public safety, while opposition figures labeled the move as disproportionate and aimed at suppressing dissent. Journalists covering the events faced the same hazards as participants, with some reporting harassment and limited access to certain areas. Community organizations urged families to stay indoors during the most intense moments and to check official updates before traveling. Analysts suggested that the incident could influence future demonstrations, media policy debates, and the political calculus surrounding Georgia’s European ambitions, prompting discussions about safeguard measures for journalists and civilians alike.
Earlier, the Ministry of Internal Affairs stated that protesters planned to block strategic objects, a claim that heightened concerns about disruptions to critical infrastructure. The day’s developments underscored the broader debate over governance, media freedom, and Georgia’s path toward closer ties with Europe. Officials stressed that the country would remain open to dialogue and diplomacy, even as security operations continued to prevent any escalation that could threaten essential services. Observers pointed out that social media was awash with conflicting information, highlighting the importance of reliable reporting and official communications. In the weeks ahead, analysts expect more demonstrations and negotiations to shape the political landscape, along with ongoing scrutiny of how authorities handle mass gatherings and protect journalists. The events remind readers of the delicate balance between public expression and the rule of law, and of the vital role that independent reporting plays in safeguarding democratic processes in Georgia.