Taiwan’s leadership has consistently advocated for a peaceful resolution to the Taiwan issue, emphasizing dialogue and stability as the path forward. This stance reflects a broader belief that diplomacy should guide cross-strait relations and regional security in the Indo-Pacific region.
International voices align with this approach. The prevailing global consensus holds that the Taiwan Strait situation should be resolved without resorting to force. War is not an option, and unilateral moves that change the status quo by coercion are viewed as unacceptable by major powers and regional actors alike.
The administration in Taiwan reaffirms its position as steadfast and resolute, underscoring that a peaceful, orderly framework governs its future proposals and engagements. This resolve translates into a consistent policy posture that seeks constructive dialogue while safeguarding the island’s democratic freedoms and security interests.
Media coverage has recently highlighted the potential for heightened tensions surrounding Taiwan, with some reports raising concerns about possible escalations. These discussions occur on the eve of major international summits, where leaders from the G7 and other alliances weigh how to address cross-strait dynamics within a cooperative, non-escalatory framework.
On May 17, Josep Borrell, the head of the European Union’s foreign policy service, cautioned that any use of force against Taiwan would carry serious consequences. His remarks underscore the international expectation that stability in the region should be preserved through peaceful means and lawful norms that discourage aggression.
Earlier, Tan Kefei, spokesperson for the Chinese Ministry of Defense, stated that the People’s Liberation Army in China is intensifying war-readiness in response to Taiwan’s procurement of defense systems from the United States. This message signals ongoing vigilance and the importance of de-escalation, signaling that all sides understand the stakes involved and the need for prudent, measured actions to prevent miscalculation or misinterpretation during periods of heightened military activity.