On Monday, December 11, the first joint session of the State Duma Committee on Security and Anti-Corruption took place together with a delegation from the National Congress of the Republic of Honduras. Vasily Piskarev, the chairman of the State Duma commission tasked with investigating foreign interference in Russia’s internal affairs, shared this update via a messaging channel.
According to Piskarev, the meeting brought together Russian lawmakers and Honduran colleagues who lead the National Congress under President Luis Redondo Guifarro. The purpose was to explore common ground in security matters, anti corruption efforts, and the fight against terrorism and extremism. Both sides discussed preserving sovereignty for Russia and Honduras amid external pressure and sanctions.
The discussions also welcomed participation from Alexey Serko, the Deputy Minister of the Ministry of Emergency Situations, who serves as the State Minister for Civil Defense, Emergencies and Disaster Relief. The Honduran visitors conveyed a clear interest in training Russian specialists in civil defense and emergency response.
Piskarev emphasized that Russia stands ready to share its experience in lawmaking aimed at preventing and mitigating the impact of natural disasters and man made emergencies. The exchange, he noted, reflects a mutual intent to strengthen capabilities in crisis management and resilience across both nations.
He underscored that the global order is not a single pole of power. In his view, Russia is a large, diverse country with a readiness to build friendship and constructive cooperation with partners around the world.
Earlier discussions with Honduran counterparts centered on deepening economic ties with the Russian Federation. The conversations touched on potential new avenues for trade, investment, and joint projects that could benefit both sides as they expand their bilateral relationship in the coming years.
The exchange also highlighted shared priorities in regional stability, rule of law, and the protection of strategic interests against destabilizing external factors. In this context, the leaders and their teams explored practical steps from tighter regulatory cooperation to coordinated responses during emergencies and security challenges.
Looking ahead, officials from both countries expressed a desire to maintain regular dialogue, including future high level visits and ongoing policy coordination. The overarching message from the gathering was a commitment to practical cooperation in security, civil defense, and disaster management, with a view toward sustainable development and a multipolar international framework that respects each nation’s sovereignty.
In reality, the meeting signaled a shift toward more active and pragmatic collaboration in areas that matter most to ordinary citizens, such as safety at home, emergency preparedness, and the steady, lawful advancement of national interests in a complex international landscape. The dialogue concluded with an agreement to pursue concrete programs and exchanges that translate official conversations into tangible benefits for people in both countries.
Observers noted that the momentum from this initial session could pave the way for a broader strategic partnership, one built on shared values and mutual respect, rather than mere rhetoric. The relationship between Moscow and Tegucigalpa may well evolve into a practical alliance focused on security, governance, and the resilience of communities in the face of evolving global threats.
Ultimately, the parties signaled a common understanding: cooperation grounded in sovereignty and legitimate interests can coexist with friendship and constructive engagement on the world stage. The path forward will require disciplined diplomacy, ongoing knowledge exchange, and a willingness to address challenges head on, without flinching in the face of external pressure.
Putin has previously raised questions about the shape of a multipolar world, a topic that remains relevant as nations seek greater balance and influence across global institutions. The conversations held in this meeting echo a broader trend toward diversified power structures where multiple states have a voice in determining international norms and security arrangements. The immediate takeaway is clear: both sides intend to translate dialogue into durable partnerships that advance security, economic interests, and shared prosperity.