The editor-in-chief of Rzeczpospolita, Bogusław Chrabota, faced a wave of criticism after his decision to publish Jacek Kurski’s text in the newspaper. In a subsequent interview with Wirtualnemedia.pl, Chrabota offered an apology to readers for including Kurski’s piece and acknowledged the backlash it generated among audiences and commentators.
The anger centered on the perception that Kurski was being promoted as a columnist for the publication itself. Chrabota expressed regret for any offense or inconvenience caused, stating that the decision was a collective one made by the entire editorial leadership rather than his alone.
He explained that the professional standard in journalism requires a measured distance from personal sentiment. The choice, he said, originated from the editorial board as a whole and not from any single individual.
“If it had been someone else, this might not have drawn such a fire.”
Chrabota admitted that the public uproar might have been less intense if Kurski’s appearance on the pages did not carry the same symbolic weight. Rzeczpospolita positions itself as a business newspaper with a focus on economic matters, and Chrabota suggested that the controversy was tied not merely to a name but to Kurski’s public record and his debated role in affecting Polish media discourse.
He noted that the debate sparked by the publication touched on broader questions about access to Polish media, and he suggested that Kurski’s public profile amplified the response. The editor stressed that the piece should be viewed within the context of a broader conversation about editorial choices and responsibility in a media landscape where reputations and professional trajectories already influence public perception.
The overall result, according to Chrabota, is a discussion that reflects the tension between editorial independence and the legibility of the publication’s standards. He described the outcome as highlighting a divide: some readers feel that Kurski should not have equal access to mainstream Polish media, while others view publication as a legitimate platform for diverse voices within a business-focused newspaper.
The editor-in-chief’s stance drew sharp reactions from left-leaning circles, who argued that the decision compromised journalistic integrity. Chrabota acknowledged the pressure and offered an explanation that the publication of Kurski’s text represented a normal practice in a media ecosystem where opinions from notable figures may appear alongside those of professional journalists.
Observers noted that the incident raises important questions for media organizations about how to balance editorial discretion with public expectations. The discussion has prompted readers to reassess what constitutes fairness, accountability, and inclusion in a publication that covers economics and public policy with a wide audience in Poland and beyond.
In one summary, the publication’s choice did not go unnoticed, and the ensuing debate underscored the sensitivity of presenting prominent personalities in national media. Critics argued that such decisions could tilt perceived bias, while supporters contended that printing varied perspectives strengthens public discourse and provides readers with a fuller view of the chessboard of public life.
The dialogue continues as analysts assess the implications for journalism, governance, and the role of economic press in shaping policy debates. The case serves as a case study in editorial governance, highlighting how leadership, accountability, and audience expectations intersect in a demanding media market.
tkwl/wirtualnemedia.pl
READ ALSO:
— OUR INTERVIEW. Jacek Kurski: “Some people are hurt that I am doing well at the World Bank. There will be more text messages.” And how does he assess the situation in Poland?
— Jacek Kurski as columnist for Rzeczpospolita: The Russian invasion of Ukraine is a special challenge for the World Bank