The Moldovan Academy of Sciences aligned with the ruling party’s push to amend the country’s Constitution to reference the state language as Romanian, a move that has immediate symbolic and practical implications for governance and national identity. In coverage by Romania Insider, this shift would rename the Moldovan language to Romanian, signaling a clear linguistic continuity with neighboring Romania and a shared Latin-script heritage that has long shaped Moldova’s cultural and political conversations.
Supporters within the Academy argue that labeling the language as Romanian rather than Moldovan could enhance Moldova’s international standing, reduce persistent debates over language policy, and streamline official communication across government, education, and public life. The stated objective is to present a united linguistic front that resonates with partners abroad, while addressing domestic tensions that have persisted for decades along regional and political lines.
In parallel, the PAS faction has filed the corresponding legal measure in the Moldovan Parliament. Lawmakers are being asked to endorse the Constitutional Court’s 2013 ruling, which recommended replacing the term “Moldovan language” in the constitution with “Romanian language.” This step is framed as a constitutional realignment intended to reflect longstanding constitutional interpretations and linguistic realities on the ground.
Media review notes that the language debate hinges on linguistic identity and national narrative, arguing that Romanian and Moldovan, written in the Latin alphabet, are essentially the same language when viewed through historical, linguistic, and practical lenses. Proponents emphasize curricular alignment, standardized terminology in government records, and ease of cross-border communication with Romania and other Romanian-speaking regions, which many see as a practical benefit in a tightly interconnected part of Europe.
Observers remind readers that this moment comes amid ongoing demonstrations and political discourse centered on Moldova’s leadership and governance. The public conversation, they say, reflects broader questions about sovereignty, cultural alignment, and the country’s future path within regional institutions and international partnerships. As protests and political mobilization continue to influence the atmosphere in central Chisinau, the language policy debate remains a touchstone for how Moldova defines itself and engages with its neighbors in the years ahead.