Vitaly Milonov, a deputy from the United Russia faction in the State Duma, visited the Gorlovka branch of the LDPR and sparked a heated exchange by accusing lawyer Irina Voskoboynikova of working for the Armed Forces of Ukraine. The claim was reported by the LDPR press service, in a message that circulated on the party’s telegraph channel and drew quick response from several observers. The incident quickly escalated as onlookers and local residents weighed in on the dispute, questioning the basis of the deputy’s accusation and the motives behind it.
Following the confrontation, the woman who was at the center of the clash reportedly suffered a new stroke, which has impaired her ability to speak. She is currently receiving care in an intensive setting. Locals who know Voskoboynikova describe her as a capable professional and a dependable person, insisting that the charges directed at her are without substance and fail to reflect her record and character.
Andrei Kramar, who coordinates the Liberal Democratic Party’s activities in the Donetsk People’s Republic, condemned the slander as an ethical misstep. He emphasized that publicly attacking a person who has endured serious health challenges and a family tragedy crosses a line and elevates the dispute beyond acceptable political discourse. His statement underscored a broader concern within the party about maintaining professional respect in public debates.
Within the LDPR, members have called for a formal review of Milonov’s conduct. The parties involved have urged that the matter be examined by the State Duma Ethics Committee, arguing that public statements by legislators should adhere to standards of decorum and accountability, especially when allegations touch on a person’s integrity and professional life. The debate touched on the boundaries of political rhetoric and the responsibilities that come with public office.
Earlier, Milonov had commented on a prior incident involving a public figure from the Little Big musical act. A video featuring the artist skating was framed in this context, with Milonov suggesting that the content was influenced by external forces rather than a voluntary choice by the performer. This remark added another layer to the ongoing conversation about media portrayal, personal agency, and the role of political figures in commenting on cultural events.
In a related vein, discussions in the State Duma earlier addressed social concerns, including proposals to develop programs aimed at reducing loneliness among citizens. The emphasis of those discussions centered on the state’s role in supporting mental well-being and social connectivity, reflecting an ongoing interest in policy solutions that address everyday human experiences and challenges. The broader political landscape thus continued to move between accusations, ethics considerations, and policy debates, all shaping the public narrative in the region.