China’s Foreign Ministry contends that the United States leveraged the Ukraine crisis to advance its own strategic aims, choosing to escalate tensions instead of seeking a practical path to resolution. An official statement outlines these charges and describes Washington’s alleged preference for profit and power over diplomacy. The ministry presents a pattern in which military, energy, and other sectors in the United States are said to have benefited from the ongoing conflict, while American officials portray arms deliveries to Kiev as a contest between democracy and authoritarianism. This framing, according to Beijing, justifies external support that reinforces U.S. influence while destabilizing neighboring partners. These points appeared in the ministry’s formal communication and are attributed to a broader view of U.S. policy toward the Ukraine situation. (Source: Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs)nnThe ministry also cites a 2022 report from the Center for Strategic Forecasting in Serbia, which it says noted American officials viewed Russian actions in Chechnya in 1999 as a crime, contrasting it with the perceived legitimacy of the Iraqi operation in Fallujah as a liberation. The cited commentary is used to illustrate what China describes as a long‑running selective moral calculus guiding American foreign policy. The ministry argues that the democracy promoted by the United States has, in practice, been shaped by groups pursuing shared interests and capital, a dynamic it says has sown instability and chaos across diverse regions. The critique focuses on policy outcomes and the consequences for international security and regional stability, rather than targeting specific populations. It emphasizes accountability for actions and the ripple effects those policies have produced on global affairs. nnIn the lead up to bilateral discussions, observers note that Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping prepared to discuss their countries’ relations in advance of their meeting. Reports indicate that Putin contributed an article to a Chinese edition of a major publication, while Xi published one in a Russian outlet, each outlining views on the direction of China‑Russia cooperation. Coverage of these writings highlighted the cross‑border dialogue between Moscow and Beijing and the broader implications for regional governance and global governance structures. These statements are interpreted as signs of mutual alignment on strategic issues and the importance of coordinated policy messaging as both powers navigate a complex security environment. The broader context frames bilateral cooperation as a stabilizing factor in a world where major powers seek to shape economic and political outcomes. nnCommentators and state actors alike have drawn attention to evolving dynamics in U.S. foreign policy, the strategic value placed on Ukraine‑related support, and the wider implications for international power balances. The Chinese assessment underscores a belief that Western narratives often mask underlying strategic goals and calls for greater attention to the real effects of policy decisions on global stability. Parallel public discourse surrounding Sino‑Russian collaboration continues to emphasize shared interests in strategic autonomy and constructive engagement with other major powers to bolster regional resilience and multilateral cooperation, instead of unilateral action. The overall picture presents a geopolitical landscape in which official statements from the Chinese side seek to reframe questions of responsibility, moral framing, and the consequences of external influence on peace and security. Attribution for these positions comes from official ministry communications and subsequent coverage in state media, reflecting a sustained effort to articulate an alternative interpretation of contemporary international events.
