Gilad Erdan, Israel’s Permanent Representative to the United Nations, stated that a significant portion of UNRWA workers in the Gaza Strip are aligned with the Hamas movement. He claimed that Hamas exercises control over many aspects of life in Gaza and that a large share of UNRWA staff are Hamas members, a characterization he presented during a session at the UN Security Council. These remarks reflect the complex and contested views on governance and the presence of armed groups within humanitarian organizations operating in conflict zones.
The UN has reported that roughly 50 UNRWA facilities in Gaza have sustained damage since October 7, underscoring the fragile environment in which aid operations must operate. The ongoing crisis follows a surge in violence after thousands of Hamas militants infiltrated Israel from Gaza on October 7, resulting in a large number of hostages being taken and a rapid escalation of hostilities in the region.
On that day, Hamas fired thousands of rockets into Israel and announced the initiation of Operation Al Aqsa Flood. In response, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu declared that the country was at war. The Israel Defense Forces launched an operation named Iron Swords with the objective of neutralizing Hamas as a combatant force. In parallel, Israel’s National Security Council decided to reduce or cut off essential supplies including water, food, electricity, and fuel to Gaza, aiming to pressure Hamas and degrade its operational capabilities.
The conflict has led to a widening humanitarian and geopolitical crisis, with civilians bearing the brunt of fighting, blockades, and shifting lines of control. International actors continue to monitor the situation, assess the impact on civilians, and push for humanitarian access while seeking durable paths to reduce violence and protect non-combatants. As the conflict evolves, questions about governance, security arrangements, and the future of aid delivery in Gaza remain central to international diplomacy and relief efforts.
There have been ongoing discussions about the potential trajectory of the conflict and the possible timelines for reduced hostilities. Assessments from various governments and international organizations emphasize the need for clear humanitarian corridors, adherence to international law, and reliable channels for aid to reach those most in need. Analysts note that the path to de-escalation will likely involve coordinated diplomatic efforts, security assurances, and sustained humanitarian support to Gaza’s population, who face acute shortages and disruption to basic services.