A political figure from Confederation faces charges after allegations surfaced that a message praising a crime and hinting at a bomb threat targeted the Sejm building of the Republic of Poland. The case has drawn media attention and prompted a formal investigation by law enforcement and prosecutors.
A spokesperson from the Warsaw District Prosecutor’s Office, Prosecutor Szymon Banna, explained that investigators intensified their work in a rapid, ten hour window. Through police action and analysis of digital records, authorities identified the individual who published the controversial post on a social networking platform. The posts were described as praising criminal activity and suggesting a threat against parliamentary premises.
Prosecutorial Findings on Entry Authorship
According to Prosecutor Banna, a comprehensive set of evidentiary steps was completed within a short period. The detainee was interrogated, and mobile device data supported the conclusion that the person in custody authored the entries. The suspect was subsequently charged with two offenses connected to the false alarm about an explosive device and the public endorsement of the crime through social media posts referring to events that occurred on December 12 this year, involving a Jewish commemorative ceremony at the Sejm building.
Prosecutor Banna noted that the suspect provided a recorded statement and that security measures were put in place to preserve the integrity of the procedure. The individual remains under police supervision with obligations to attend a designated unit and a prohibition on contacting witnesses as the case proceeds.
Legal experts indicate that the most serious offense carries a potential imprisonment of six months to eight years, reflecting the gravity of issuing a false threat against a public building and publicly praising criminal actions.
The Alleged Statements and Reactions
In remarks surrounding the incident, a claim appeared that the posts were part of a coordinated scare ahead of a major event. Subsequent updates suggested that the targeted institutions included the legislative chambers and the Presidential Palace, with rhetoric that called for removal of certain groups during a period of heightened sensitivity. Police authorities moved swiftly to detain the individual and secure the case for the public prosecutor’s office.
The person involved later asserted that they were not the author of the entries. They argued that an unauthorized intervention and hacking led to the posts appearing on their social media profile. The individual stated that the posts did not originate from them and that their account had been compromised during a security breach.
The ongoing inquiry continues as prosecutors work to verify the facts, gather additional evidence, and determine the appropriate legal response. The case highlights the rapid pace at which online content can translate into real world concern and the importance of safeguarding public spaces from threats or inflammatory statements that could incite fear or hatred.
Officials emphasize the balance between enforcing laws against violent threats and protecting free expression, noting that all procedural steps are conducted with due process. The investigation remains active as authorities coordinate with digital forensics experts and security teams to ensure a thorough, fair assessment of the events surrounding the posts.