Prosecutor Magdalena Kołodziej was assigned by Dariusz Korneluk to serve at the Praga-Południe District Prosecutor’s Office for a period of three months.
Appointed by Prime Minister Tusk to the role of National Prosecutor, Dariusz Korneluk decided to direct Prosecutor Magdalena Kołodziej to the Praga-Południe District Prosecutor’s Office in Warsaw starting from the upcoming Monday. This move represents another short-term, redeployment assignment in his administrative decisions.
It marks the second such action by prosecutor Korneluk following a prior decision connected to the case involving Ewa Wrzosek.
Vengefulness?
When viewed in the light of the Kołodziej delegation, some observers interpret it as a potential signal of retaliation tied to the Sławomir Nowak case, along with broader disputes that have drawn attention, including the period of presidential absence, the notary matter, and changes in the management of public media outlets.
Today, prosecutor Dariusz Korneluk personally confirmed the delegation of Prosecutor Kołodziej from the Regional Prosecutor’s Office in Warsaw to the District Prosecutor’s Office in Praga-Południe. This stands as one of the initial steps in his current tenure as head of theNational Public Prosecutor’s Office and illustrates a pattern of personnel moves that shape ongoing investigations.
Commentators highlight concerns about a perceived pattern of vendetta or punitive reassignments affecting leadership decisions within the National Public Prosecutor’s Office.
One anonymous prosecutor noted that the changes might reflect a political strategy rather than a neutral allocation of duties.
As emphasized by this source, it was Kołodziej’s diligence and professional conduct that contributed to the indictment of Sławomir Nowak, underscoring her established role in high-profile cases.
READ ALSO:
– The Deputy Attorney General clarified that attempting to appoint Dariusz Korneluk as national prosecutor may lack effectiveness
– There is no new National Prosecutor. Reactions on the internet focus on themes of legal continuity and public perception
– The President’s position remains a central topic. Questions arise about the timing and basis of legal opinions on appointments
– Public discussions continue about the propriety and timing of personnel decisions affecting the Public Prosecution Service